-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify circuit parameter configuration by always deriving MaxValues and BatchSizes from TreeDepths #1066
Closed
1 task done
Comments
ctrlc03
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2024
…ead calculate Simplify logic and save gas by computing maxValues within MACI vs passing as parameter to deployPoll. fix #1066
3 tasks
ctrlc03
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2024
…ead calculate Simplify logic and save gas by computing maxValues within MACI vs passing as parameter to deployPoll. fix #1066
ctrlc03
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2024
…ead calculate Simplify logic and save gas by computing maxValues within MACI vs passing as parameter to deployPoll. fix #1066
ctrlc03
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2024
…Poll() and instead calculate Simplify logic and save gas by computing maxValues within MACI vs passing as parameter to deployPoll. Also remove batchSizes and compute within the smart contracts, as well as remove large number of calls to the poll contract, and instead pass parameters around functions. fix #1066
ctrlc03
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2024
…Poll() and instead calculate Simplify logic and save gas by computing maxValues within MACI vs passing as parameter to deployPoll. Also remove batchSizes and compute within the smart contracts, as well as remove large number of calls to the poll contract, and instead pass parameters around functions. fix #1066
ctrlc03
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2024
…Poll() and instead calculate Simplify logic and save gas by computing maxValues within MACI vs passing as parameter to deployPoll. Also remove batchSizes and compute within the smart contracts, as well as remove large number of calls to the poll contract, and instead pass parameters around functions. fix #1066
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Prerequisites
Please answer the following question for yourself before submitting a feature request.
Motivation
Currently, to use these circuits from the ceremony,
tallyVotes_6-2-3
processMessage_6-8-2-3
applications (e.g clr.fund) have to pass the derivable data
Change request:
The intent is to minimize inconsistency and error in applications passing the wrong messageBatchSize or MaxValues to MACI.
Details
Please describe your feature request in detail.
Make sure that you have reviewed MACI's Contributor Guidelines
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: