Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency tap to v18 - autoclosed #298

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 15, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
tap (source) ^16.0.1 -> ^18.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

tapjs/tapjs (tap)

v18.7.0

Compare Source

v18.6.1

Compare Source

v18.6.0

Compare Source

v18.5.8

Compare Source

v18.5.7

Compare Source

v18.5.6

Compare Source

v18.5.5

Compare Source

v18.5.4

Compare Source

v18.5.3

Compare Source

v18.5.2

Compare Source

v18.5.1

Compare Source

v18.5.0

Compare Source

v18.4.6

Compare Source

v18.4.5

Compare Source

v18.4.4

Compare Source

v18.4.3

Compare Source

v18.4.2

Compare Source

v18.4.1

Compare Source

v18.4.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Note: The formatting of Symbol objects and enumerable Symbol properties has changed in snapshots and object diffs.

You may need to run tap --snapshot after updating to this release, and/or update some tests that were relying on symbol property keys being ignored.

  • Include Symbol keys in formatting/comparison.
  • Print symbols in formatted objects as Symbol.for(...) if appropriate.
  • Print known symbols from the Symbol constructor as Symbol.<key>, eg Symbol.iterator instead of
    Symbol(Symbol.iterator).
  • Add reporter-file config option https://github.com/tapjs/tapjs/pull/931

Full Changelog: https://github.com/tapjs/tapjs/compare/[email protected]@18.4.0

v18.3.1

Compare Source

Bug-fix, actually turning off type checking by default, as intended.

v18.3.0

Compare Source

Full Changelog: https://github.com/tapjs/tapjs/commits/[email protected]

v18.2.2

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: https://github.com/tapjs/tapjs/commits/[email protected]

v18.2.1

Compare Source

Note: this is the first auto-generated release notes release for tap 18, and GitHub picked up every change in all the repos pulled into the monorepo since forever. It's not technically "incorrect" per se, but it is unhelpful. Moving forward, these will be hopefully much less absurd. My apologies for the spam if you were tagged in this.


What's Changed
New Contributors

Full Changelog: https://github.com/tapjs/tapjs/commits/[email protected]

v18.2.0

Compare Source

v18.1.5

Compare Source

v18.1.4

Compare Source

v18.1.3

Compare Source

v18.1.2

Compare Source

v18.1.1

Compare Source

v18.1.0

Compare Source

v18.0.4

Compare Source

v18.0.3

Compare Source

v18.0.2

Compare Source

v18.0.1

Compare Source

v18.0.0

Compare Source

v16.3.10

Compare Source

v16.3.9

Compare Source

v16.3.8

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency tap to v18 chore(deps): update dependency tap to v18 - autoclosed May 22, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this May 22, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/tap-18.x branch May 22, 2024 03:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants