Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update block publishing to 2.4.2 spec #13376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2023
Merged

Update block publishing to 2.4.2 spec #13376

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2023

Conversation

rkapka
Copy link
Contributor

@rkapka rkapka commented Dec 22, 2023

What type of PR is this?

Other

What does this PR do? Why is it needed?

@rkapka rkapka added the API Api related tasks label Dec 22, 2023
@rkapka rkapka requested a review from a team as a code owner December 22, 2023 17:38
@rkapka rkapka enabled auto-merge December 22, 2023 17:38
@rkapka rkapka added the Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review label Dec 22, 2023
@rkapka rkapka added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 22, 2023
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 7d64104 Dec 22, 2023
17 checks passed
@rkapka rkapka deleted the publish-block-2.4.2 branch December 22, 2023 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@james-prysm james-prysm james-prysm approved these changes

@kasey kasey Awaiting requested review from kasey kasey is a code owner automatically assigned from prysmaticlabs/core-team

@rauljordan rauljordan Awaiting requested review from rauljordan rauljordan is a code owner automatically assigned from prysmaticlabs/core-team

@nisdas nisdas Awaiting requested review from nisdas nisdas is a code owner automatically assigned from prysmaticlabs/core-team

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
API Api related tasks Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rkapka @james-prysm