Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use (squashed) subtree, not submodule, to include pd-lib-builder #7

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aaaaalbert
Copy link

Note: This is an alternative version of #6 using a squashed subtree.

The pd-lib-builder tips-and-tricks document suggests that repositories should include pd-lib-builder by declaring it a git-subtree rather than a git-submodule.

This PR does that: It removes the previous submodule-type of inclusion, and implements the subtree-type inclusion instead. In contrast to #6 which pulls in the full commit history of the subtree, this PR here squashes the history before inclusion.

Note: I don't actually suggest that using subtree is the way to go. At least for me it has been almost a decade since I last pondered the subtree-vs-submodule question. However, I think that the "helloworld" example linked from pd-lib-builder's README should follow best announced practices.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant