Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update PVGIS test data files #1396

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2022
Merged

Update PVGIS test data files #1396

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2022

Conversation

kandersolar
Copy link
Member

@kandersolar kandersolar commented Feb 2, 2022

  • [ ] Closes #xxxx
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
  • [ ] Tests added
  • [ ] Updates entries to docs/sphinx/source/api.rst for API changes.
  • Adds description and name entries in the appropriate "what's new" file in docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew for all changes. Includes link to the GitHub Issue with :issue:`num` or this Pull Request with :pull:`num`. Includes contributor name and/or GitHub username (link with :ghuser:`user`).
  • [ ] New code is fully documented. Includes numpydoc compliant docstrings, examples, and comments where necessary.
  • Pull request is nearly complete and ready for detailed review.
  • Maintainer: Appropriate GitHub Labels and Milestone are assigned to the Pull Request and linked Issue.

For reasons unknown, some values returned by the PVGIS TMY API have changed in the last decimal place (e.g. 670.72 -> 670.71). See failing tests in #1395.

@kandersolar kandersolar added this to the 0.9.1 milestone Feb 2, 2022
@kandersolar kandersolar marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2022 00:42
@mikofski
Copy link
Member

mikofski commented Feb 2, 2022

I think you should mention this in what's new maybe?

@kandersolar
Copy link
Member Author

Oh, I had thought this was just an internal testing detail that users wouldn't care about, but I guess it's worth mentioning that the API is returning different values?

Copy link
Member

@mikofski mikofski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@mikofski mikofski merged commit 291631a into pvlib:master Feb 2, 2022
@kandersolar kandersolar deleted the pvgis_fix branch February 2, 2022 01:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants