Fix node.statement overload typing #1308
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cdce8p
added
the
Maintenance
DanielNoord
approved these changes
Dec 22, 2021
tushar-deepsource
pushed a commit
to tushar-deepsource/astroid
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Based on #1263 (comment)
The
node.statement()overloads should only allow two different call signatures:node.statement()node.statement(future=True)Without this change,
node.statement(future=None)would also be valid.--
Pylint issue for false-positive with
arguments-differand overloads: pylint-dev/pylint#5264