-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add and fix tests for init-hook based plugin load #7475
Merged
Pierre-Sassoulas
merged 4 commits into
pylint-dev:main
from
daogilvie:7264-regressions-for-plugin-load-oddities
Sep 16, 2022
Merged
Add and fix tests for init-hook based plugin load #7475
Pierre-Sassoulas
merged 4 commits into
pylint-dev:main
from
daogilvie:7264-regressions-for-plugin-load-oddities
Sep 16, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This changes 4 existing tests, due to a misunderstanding of the author (past me) in a couple of the details of those tests. Specifically, we now copy a single python file to use as our plugin, and make sure to correctly check for the name as given in the checker classes. We also make sure not to accidentally load the old copy of the plugin, which apparently sits in a directory that is already on the system path. There is also a single new test, which covers the cases of loading a plugin with ``init-hook`` magic, both specified in an rc file, but in different orders. This should be sufficient to close the issue around #7264.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3068087928
💛 - Coveralls |
DanielNoord
previously approved these changes
Sep 16, 2022
As per @DanielNoord's suggestion Co-authored-by: Daniël van Noord <[email protected]>
DanielNoord
previously approved these changes
Sep 16, 2022
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
DanielNoord
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2022
Pierre-Sassoulas
added
the
Maintenance
Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow
label
Sep 16, 2022
Pierre-Sassoulas
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @daogilvie !
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type of Changes
Description
This changes 4 existing tests, due to a misunderstanding of the author (past me) in a couple of the details of those tests. Specifically, we now copy a single python file to use as our plugin, and make sure to correctly check for the name as given in the checker classes. We also make sure not to accidentally load the old copy of the plugin, which apparently sits in a directory that is already on the system path.
There is also a single new test, which covers the cases of loading a plugin with
init-hook
magic, both specified in an rc file, but in different orders.This and #7276 are the only outstanding PRs preventing closure of #7264.
Refs #7264.