Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ignore quantifiers when splitting comma-separated regexes #8898
Ignore quantifiers when splitting comma-separated regexes #8898
Changes from 9 commits
8be7a33
40889e3
3347cf5
b48c339
cdc55b8
98bc01f
42d4e66
b4798ae
fdd914a
a62a6fc
73599e4
4de6f9d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Codecov message looks important since that line yields a value and apparently isn’t covered?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No current code path sends a list of strings to this util, or the one above it (also missing coverage for the analogous line). Should we just delete these lines? Not certain--I think it makes sense to let this util be this permissive. Also helps guard against unexpected input. I'm inclined to leave as is. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think taking the time to try to understand is not worth it vs just not touching it.