-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Also check Lambda for await-outside-async #9653
Also check Lambda for await-outside-async #9653
Conversation
4597886
to
d43e3c7
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
d43e3c7
to
482f3f5
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests β
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9653 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.86% 95.86%
=======================================
Files 174 174
Lines 18907 18907
=======================================
Hits 18125 18125
Misses 782 782
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks straightforward, thank you. Could you simply add a fragment for a false negative ? As there's no related issue you can ref this MR directly in the fragment with Refs #9653
.
Can you add that for me? I don't have |
You can copy paste a file in https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/tree/main/doc/whatsnew/fragments and name it |
6617d51
to
0582238
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great first contribution thank you !
π€ According to the primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. π€π This comment was generated for commit 0582238 |
Type of Changes
Description
Also check Lambda for await-outside-async.