Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport maintenance/3.2.x] Fix a false positive for missing-param-doc #9793

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 9cd5c37 from #9740.

* Fix a false positive for ``missing-param-doc`` where a method which is decorated with ``typing.overload`` was expected to have a docstring specifying its parameters.

Closes #9739

(cherry picked from commit 9cd5c37)
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls added this to the 3.2.6 milestone Jul 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.81%. Comparing base (bd4c8f1) to head (dac28e7).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/3.2.x    #9793   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              95.81%   95.81%           
==================================================
  Files                    174      174           
  Lines                  18856    18858    +2     
==================================================
+ Hits                   18067    18069    +2     
  Misses                   789      789           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
pylint/extensions/docparams.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls merged commit 8410f57 into maintenance/3.2.x Jul 15, 2024
24 checks passed
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls deleted the backport-9740-to-maintenance/3.2.x branch July 15, 2024 12:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants