-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
delete some dead code #6129
delete some dead code #6129
Conversation
(sorry for the random ping, noticed this hasn't gotten any attention in 7 days) -- @pradyunsg does this look ok? |
Sorry for the delay in responding -- I'll get to this post #6106. :) |
Sounds good! good luck with the new release 🎉 |
@pradyunsg ping :D |
Heyo! We're not at 19.0.2 yet -- I'll get to this once that's out the door. |
@pradyunsg 👋 <3 |
Thanks @cjerdonek! That means all but that method should probably get cleaned up. :3 |
I've rebased, leaving that one commit out |
Thanks @asottile! (for this PR and also for writing and open sourcing some really cool tools) :D |
No problem! 🎉 |
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
dead code detected via dead
(noticed this issue while doing this -- worked around it with
grep
)here's the summary of the removed things:
hidden
: last reference removed in 8447f39_copy_dist_from_dir
: introduced in 4c405a0 but not referencedhas_requirements
: last reference removed in 893f0b0read_text_file
: last reference removed in 52d87f2planned to be used in a future PRremove_auth_from_url
: last reference removed in 78371ccThe eventual "clean" command I reached was:
most of the exclusions are type aliases (asottile/dead#5 not recognizing PEP 484 type comments)