Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Ege Akman <[email protected]>

docs/monthly-meeting/2023-12.md

@@ -29,51 +29,45 @@ Please take a second to read through it!
 
 ## Discussion
 
-* [Ryan] standard library documentation reference and adding types to it in a structured way.  For example, `collections.Counter.most_common` could be written
+- [Ryan] Standard library documentation reference and adding types to it in a structured way. For example, `collections.Counter.most_common` could be written as `most_common(n: int) -> list[tuple[Any, int]]`.
+  - [Petr] ... or `list[tuple[KeyType, int]]`?
+  - This has been discussed. There was opposition to adding the types to the stdlib code itself.
+  - [Jim] I sometimes wish for more normative, less chatty module documentation:
+    - e.g. [*heapq* module](https://docs.python.org/3/library/heapq.html)
+    - e.g. old issue 29428 [*Doctest documentation unclear about multi-line fixtures*](https://bugs.python.org/issue29428)
 
-      most_common(n: int) -> list[tuple[Any, int]]
+- [Petr] Use emoji to illustrate good and bad example commit messages
+  - https://devguide.python.org/getting-started/git-boot-camp/#accepting-and-merging-a-pull-request
+  - [python/devguide#1235](https://github.com/python/devguide/pull/1235)
+  - Should we do this for PEPs? See [python/docs-community#22](https://github.com/python/docs-community/issues/22)
+  - [Hugo] See also [python/peps#3567](https://github.com/python/peps/pull/3567) for green/red sidebars for good/bad example code in PEPs
+  - [Jim] don't forget accessibility constraints when coming up with the style guide. For example, some readers are red/green colorblind. ✅/❌ are good in that they are legible even without color.
 
-  [Petr] ... or `list[tuple[KeyType, int]]`?
-
-  - this has been discussed. There was opposition to adding the types to the stdlib code itself.
-  - [JDLH] I sometimes wish for more normative, less chatty module documentation. e.g. [*heapq* module](https://docs.python.org/3/library/heapq.html). e.g. old issue 29428 [*Doctest documentation unclear about multi-line fixtures*](https://bugs.python.org/issue29428).
-
-* [Petr] Use emoji to illustrate good and bad example commit messages
-  * https://devguide.python.org/getting-started/git-boot-camp/#accepting-and-merging-a-pull-request
-  * [python/devguide#1235](https://github.com/python/devguide/pull/1235)
-  * Should we do this for PEPs? see [python/docs-community#22](https://github.com/python/docs-community/issues/22)
-  * [Hugo] See also [python/peps#3567](https://github.com/python/peps/pull/3567) for green/red sidebars for good/bad example code in PEPs
-  * [JDLH] don't forget accessibility constraints when coming up with the style guide. e.g. some readers are red/green colorblind. ✅❌ are good in that they are legible even without color.
-
-* [Ryan] Thoughts about completing TOML->JSON conversion table: https://docs.python.org/3/library/tomllib.html#conversion-table and the TOML spec: https://toml.io/en/v1.0.0#spec
+- [Ryan] Thoughts about completing TOML->JSON [conversion table](https://docs.python.org/3/library/tomllib.html#conversion-table) and [the TOML spec](https://toml.io/en/v1.0.0#spec)
 
 
 ## Reports and celebrations
 
 - PEP 732 ("The Python Documentation Editorial Board") has been submitted to the steering council [python/steering-council#220](https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/220)
 
-- [Jim] FYI, Unicode Standard is changing form of authoritative standard documents from PDF to HTML, with corresponding change to document production tooling. If this is interesting I can provide more info. I am in the working group which is working on the new tooling.
+- [Jim] FYI, Unicode Standard is changing form of authoritative standard documents from PDF to HTML, with corresponding change to document production tooling. If this is interesting I can provide more information. I am in the working group which is working on the new tooling.
 
 ## Follow-ups from previous meeting(s)
 
-* [Petr] [Railroad diagrams](https://discuss.python.org/t/36709/20)
-  * Streams have kinda been on other topics too
+- [Petr] [Railroad diagrams](https://discuss.python.org/t/36709/20)
+  - Streams have kind of been on other topics too
 
-* Analytics (Plausible) - CAM sent an e-mail, no reply yet
-    * CAM sent multiple follow-ups
-    * Hugo sent a follow-up two weeks ago
-    * Discussion on core dev Discord that is supportive
-    * Still no reply... :(
-
-* As a beginner, what's a good starting point?
-  * There are some "easy" issues, although they can occasionally not be actually-easy.
-  * Interested in documentation, look at Diátaxis and make changes?
-    * Diátaxis is kinda abstract for newcomers.
+- [Ege/Hugo/CAM] Analytics (Plausible) - CAM sent an e-mail (around late October), no reply yet
+  - CAM sent multiple follow-ups
+  - Hugo sent a follow-up two weeks ago
+  - Discussion on core dev Discord that is supportive
+  - Still no reply... :(
 
 ## Next meeting
 
 The docs team generally meets on the first Tuesday of every month around 20:00-ish UTC.
- * [JDLH] The first Tuesday of next month is 2 January. Will we be ready for this meeting on the day after New Year's Day? Answer: Basically yes; those who are ready will show up, others won't.
+
+- [Jim] The first Tuesday of next month is 2 January. Will we be ready for this meeting on the day after New Year's Day? Answer: Basically yes; those who are ready will show up, others won't.
 
 We have a recurring Google Calendar event for the meeting.
 Let Mariatta know your email address and she can invite you.