You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is this a new feature, an improvement, or a change to existing functionality?
Improvement
How would you describe the priority of this feature request
Medium
Please provide a clear description of problem you would like to solve.
Projects that use cuProj may prefer not to specify --expt-relaxed-constexpr. This option is no longer needed by cuProj and we should probably remove it to prevent future breakages.
After testing, neither cuSpatial nor cuProj doesn't currently need this flag enabled.
Note that the dependency on cudftestutil injects --expt-relaxed-constexpr onto the command line for cuSpatial tests. Once we remove that dependency it will be gone completely.
Describe any alternatives you have considered
Keep it. We have had at least one user of cuProj who preferred not to have this command line argument be a requirement. It's not likely, but it is possible for this to cause problems. So I think it's better to just remove it.
Is this a new feature, an improvement, or a change to existing functionality?
Improvement
How would you describe the priority of this feature request
Medium
Please provide a clear description of problem you would like to solve.
Projects that use cuProj may prefer not to specify
--expt-relaxed-constexpr
. This option is no longer needed by cuProj and we should probably remove it to prevent future breakages.After testing,
neither cuSpatial norcuProj doesn't currently need this flag enabled.Note that the dependency on
cudftestutil
injects--expt-relaxed-constexpr
onto the command line for cuSpatial tests. Once we remove that dependency it will be gone completely.Describe any alternatives you have considered
Keep it. We have had at least one user of cuProj who preferred not to have this command line argument be a requirement. It's not likely, but it is possible for this to cause problems. So I think it's better to just remove it.
Additional context
See also No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: