Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore node version on yarn install #471

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2021
Merged

Ignore node version on yarn install #471

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2021

Conversation

luancurti
Copy link
Member

Summary

Ignore node version on yarn install

Test Plan

What's required for testing (prerequisites)?

What are the steps to reproduce (after prerequisites)?

Compatibility

OS Implemented
iOS ✅ ❌
Android ✅ ❌

Checklist

  • I have tested this on a device and a simulator
  • I added the documentation in README.md
  • I updated the typed files (TS and Flow)
  • I added a sample use of the API in the example project (example/App.js)
  • I have added automated tests, either in JS or e2e tests, as applicable

@luancurti luancurti enabled auto-merge (squash) May 31, 2021 19:28
@luancurti luancurti requested a review from vonovak May 31, 2021 19:58
@vonovak
Copy link
Member

vonovak commented Jun 1, 2021

I'm going to assume this fixes the publish step of pipeline.. :)

@luancurti luancurti merged commit 3c39559 into master Jun 1, 2021
@luancurti luancurti deleted the fix/yarn-install branch June 1, 2021 07:53
vonovak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2021
## [3.5.1](v3.5.0...v3.5.1) (2021-06-01)

### Bug Fixes

* ignore node version on yarn install ([#471](#471)) ([3c39559](3c39559))
* remove unnecessary peer dependencies ([#468](#468)) ([06fbbb1](06fbbb1))
@vonovak
Copy link
Member

vonovak commented Jun 1, 2021

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.5.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@vonovak
Copy link
Member

vonovak commented Jun 1, 2021

thanks for fixing this @luancurti ! :)

@luancurti
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to assume this fixes the publish step of pipeline.. :)

that's right

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants