Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename repo #162

Closed
agjohnson opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #193
Closed

Rename repo #162

agjohnson opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #193
Labels
Improvement Minor improvement to code

Comments

@agjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

We have matured the concept of our website since this repo started and it's to the point now where this repo is less "our community site" and is more "our website". When I refer to this project, I call this our "website", instead of "landing pages" and "site-community".

It seems like a good time to rename this repo, before we start using it more heavily. I'm suggesting "readthedocs/website".

@agjohnson agjohnson added the Improvement Minor improvement to code label Sep 22, 2022
@humitos
Copy link
Member

humitos commented Sep 27, 2022

I'm suggesting "readthedocs/website".

Sounds good to me! 👍🏼

@ericholscher
Copy link
Member

Yea, website sounds good, and makes the most since for users. Though we have a lot of "websites" so it is not 100% explicit internally unless we standardize on it.

@agjohnson
Copy link
Contributor Author

I finally made good on this one. The GitHub redirect looks good, but feel free to update your remotes. I'll close with a PR with some text updates next

agjohnson added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2023
And a little clean up.

- Refs #192
- Closes #162
@agjohnson agjohnson mentioned this issue Apr 7, 2023
agjohnson added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2023
And a little clean up.

- Refs #192
- Closes #162
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Improvement Minor improvement to code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants