-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: replica selector #692
Merged
+1,454
−33
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3185bbc
feat: add reader node selector
proost 9499b9b
doc: add comments
proost 5261cb1
fix: wrong error message
proost a7062fd
test: add send read-only command to reader node
proost 76f58a3
refactor: use sendtoreplicas and replicaselector
proost 90387d2
test: remove duplicated cases
proost 9a7e752
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/redis/rueidis into feat-rea…
proost 91bbcf3
test: remove cases
proost 50fad71
perf: introduce nodes
proost File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we avoid this allocation by replacing g.nodes from
[]string
to[]ReplicaInfo
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I already consider it. But i didn't. Because
g.nodes
has primary node too. soReplicaInfo
slice type is incorrect. It can be misleading to contributors.ReplicaInfo
. ChangingReplicaInfo
is not problem to rueidis. but there can be side effect in the user side.Because of duplicated allocation, i also considering reusing
ReplicaInfo
slice. But problem is If user holdsReplicaInfo
slice in theReplicaSelector
it can be problem.I prefer reusing
ReplicaInfo
slice if should reduce allocation. And in this case, we should add comment that user must not store referenceReplicaInfo
slice.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @proost,
Great considerations!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
50fad71
OK, I changed it.