Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add memory overhead test for the datastore #6067

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

emilk
Copy link
Member

@emilk emilk commented Apr 22, 2024

Part of #6066

Shows that datastore currently uses 936 bytes to store a 16 byte RowId, a 8 byte TimeInt, and a 8 byte f64, i.e. around 29x the memory use it should have.

Checklist

  • I have read and agree to Contributor Guide and the Code of Conduct
  • I've included a screenshot or gif (if applicable)
  • I have tested the web demo (if applicable):
  • The PR title and labels are set such as to maximize their usefulness for the next release's CHANGELOG
  • If applicable, add a new check to the release checklist!

To run all checks from main, comment on the PR with @rerun-bot full-check.

@emilk emilk added 🧑‍💻 dev experience developer experience (excluding CI) 🚀 performance Optimization, memory use, etc exclude from changelog PRs with this won't show up in CHANGELOG.md labels Apr 22, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Deployed docs

Commit Link
6afadd7 https://landing-k0w2xo527-rerun.vercel.app/docs

@emilk emilk force-pushed the emilk/measure-data-store-overhead branch from 16c8995 to b51a5b6 Compare April 22, 2024 16:29
@teh-cmc teh-cmc self-requested a review April 23, 2024 07:29
@emilk emilk merged commit f69fa6a into main Apr 23, 2024
38 of 39 checks passed
@emilk emilk deleted the emilk/measure-data-store-overhead branch April 23, 2024 07:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🧑‍💻 dev experience developer experience (excluding CI) exclude from changelog PRs with this won't show up in CHANGELOG.md 🚀 performance Optimization, memory use, etc
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants