Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Debian package is old #589

Closed
balazser opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Debian package is old #589

balazser opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@balazser
Copy link

balazser commented Aug 1, 2021

Hi,
I've installed gocryptfs from Debian repository and noticed the package version is 1.6.1.
I'm wondering at some point should the package be updated?

apt info gocryptfs

Package: gocryptfs
Version: 1.6.1-1+b20

I'm using Debian Buster right now. After building the package manually I could achieve a recent version.
gocryptfs v2.0.1-40-gc6b0c77

@lechner
Copy link
Contributor

lechner commented Aug 1, 2021

@balazser The bullseye release will ship version 1.8.0. Meanwhile, the freeze disallows uploads with new features until bullseye is finalized. Do you need features that are available only in more recent versions?

@rfjakob
Copy link
Owner

rfjakob commented Aug 2, 2021

Only notable new features in v2.0 are fido2 and acl support. Unless you need these, v1.8 is fine.

v1.6.1 on the other hand has known bugs, highest impact is this (from the v1.7.1 changelog):

Fix a race condition related to inode number reuse (#363). It could be triggered by concurrently creating and deleting files and can lead to data loss in the affected file. This bug was found by the automated tests on Travis and was very hard to trigger locally.

@rfjakob
Copy link
Owner

rfjakob commented Aug 2, 2021

In any case, you can also build yourself or download a static binary from https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/releases/tag/v2.0.1

@rfjakob rfjakob closed this as completed Aug 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants