-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Travis TestWrite10 failure #363
Comments
Another one (log), and this time we have a hexdump:
|
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 5, 2019
Try to find out what goes wrong in #363
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 5, 2019
Another attempt to find out what is going on behind #363
TestWrite10Tight caught one as well: https://travis-ci.org/rfjakob/gocryptfs/jobs/502204426 |
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 5, 2019
Another attempt to find out what is going on behind #363
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 5, 2019
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2019
Try to find out what goes wrong in #363
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2019
Another attempt to find out what is going on behind #363
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2019
Running the "matrix" tests in a loop for 4 hours on my local machine ( 5.1.15-300.fc30.x86_64 ) did not trigger this. Kernel version dependent? |
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2019
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2019
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2019
This should help debugging #363 , but does no harm in normal operation as it only prints ciphertext to the log.
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2019
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2019
This should help debugging #363 , but does no harm in normal operation as it only prints ciphertext to the log.
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2019
Gotcha:
The inode number is reused before the Close() finishes |
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2019
Closing the fd means the inode number may be reused immediately by a new file, so we have to get the old fileID out of the table beforehand! Hopefully fixes #363
rfjakob
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2019
Closing the fd means the inode number may be reused immediately by a new file, so we have to get the old fileID out of the table beforehand! Hopefully fixes #363
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://api.travis-ci.org/v3/job/488037836/log.txt / https://travis-ci.org/rfjakob/gocryptfs/jobs/488037836
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: