feat(expression): Implement IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM in backend

[Graphcalibur]

What's changed and what's your intention?

• Move implementation of IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM from frontend to backend to avoid repeated evaluation of expressions (see feat(expr): Implement IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM expression #2582)
  • For IS NOT DISTINCT FROM, the frontend just binds a NOT to the bound IS DISTINCT FROM expression
• Add unit and integration tests for IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM

Checklist

• I have written necessary docs and comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

Fixes #2684

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2676 (be3b69f) into main (6652048) will increase coverage by 0.19%.
The diff coverage is 69.87%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2676      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.14%   72.34%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         681      685       +4     
  Lines       88502    89062     +560     
==========================================
+ Hits        63849    64430     +581     
+ Misses      24653    24632      -21     

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust	72.34% <69.87%> (+0.19%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/expr/src/expr/expr_binary_nonnull.rs	83.57% <ø> (ø)
src/expr/src/expr/expr_binary_nullable.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/expr/src/expr/mod.rs	48.83% <ø> (+1.21%)	⬆️
src/expr/src/expr/template.rs	60.24% <ø> (ø)
src/expr/src/vector_op/cmp.rs	55.03% <50.00%> (-0.52%)	⬇️
src/expr/src/vector_op/tests.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/frontend/src/binder/expr/mod.rs	84.28% <100.00%> (+11.07%)	⬆️
src/frontend/src/expr/type_inference.rs	98.85% <100.00%> (+0.94%)	⬆️
src/common/src/config.rs	43.43% <0.00%> (-37.19%)	⬇️
...c/frontend/src/optimizer/plan_node/batch_update.rs	51.11% <0.00%> (-23.09%)	⬇️
... and 62 more

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

[lmatz]

LGTM!

[xiangjinwu]

lgtm

Some comments out of the scope of this PR:
Historically, when comparing decimal against f32, we though they should TryInto decimal or f64. But in PostgreSQL the common type for them is f32.

This affects existing comparisons including eq, ne, lt, etc as well. The macro is using f64 and some unit tests are using decimal. This can be fixed in a separate PR.

[xiangjinwu]

Can we keep this macro in crate expr rather than in crate common?

[Graphcalibur]

Sure. Would /expr/src/expr/template.rs be a suitable place for it?