Auto merge of rust-lang#113000 - Mark-Simulacrum:beta-backport, r=Mar…

…k-Simulacrum

[beta] backport

This PR backports:

- rust-lang#112684: Disable alignment checks on i686-pc-windows-msvc
- rust-lang#112581: [rustdoc] Fix URL encoding of % sign
- rust-lang#112312: Update to LLVM 16.0.5
- rust-lang#112266: Fix type-inference regression in rust-lang#112225
- rust-lang#112062: Make struct layout not depend on unsizeable tail

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`

.gitmodules

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 [submodule "src/llvm-project"]
 	path = src/llvm-project
 	url = https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm-project.git
-	branch = rustc/16.0-2023-04-05
+	branch = rustc/16.0-2023-06-05
 [submodule "src/doc/embedded-book"]
 	path = src/doc/embedded-book
 	url = https://github.com/rust-embedded/book.git

compiler/rustc_abi/src/layout.rs

@@ -57,48 +57,54 @@ pub trait LayoutCalculator {
         // run and bias niches to the right and then check which one is closer to one of the struct's
         // edges.
         if let Some(layout) = &layout {
-            if let Some(niche) = layout.largest_niche {
-                let head_space = niche.offset.bytes();
-                let niche_length = niche.value.size(dl).bytes();
-                let tail_space = layout.size.bytes() - head_space - niche_length;
-
-                // This may end up doing redundant work if the niche is already in the last field
-                // (e.g. a trailing bool) and there is tail padding. But it's non-trivial to get
-                // the unpadded size so we try anyway.
-                if fields.len() > 1 && head_space != 0 && tail_space > 0 {
-                    let alt_layout = univariant(self, dl, fields, repr, kind, NicheBias::End)
-                        .expect("alt layout should always work");
-                    let niche = alt_layout
-                        .largest_niche
-                        .expect("alt layout should have a niche like the regular one");
-                    let alt_head_space = niche.offset.bytes();
-                    let alt_niche_len = niche.value.size(dl).bytes();
-                    let alt_tail_space = alt_layout.size.bytes() - alt_head_space - alt_niche_len;
-
-                    debug_assert_eq!(layout.size.bytes(), alt_layout.size.bytes());
-
-                    let prefer_alt_layout =
-                        alt_head_space > head_space && alt_head_space > tail_space;
-
-                    debug!(
-                        "sz: {}, default_niche_at: {}+{}, default_tail_space: {}, alt_niche_at/head_space: {}+{}, alt_tail: {}, num_fields: {}, better: {}\n\
-                        layout: {}\n\
-                        alt_layout: {}\n",
-                        layout.size.bytes(),
-                        head_space,
-                        niche_length,
-                        tail_space,
-                        alt_head_space,
-                        alt_niche_len,
-                        alt_tail_space,
-                        layout.fields.count(),
-                        prefer_alt_layout,
-                        format_field_niches(&layout, &fields, &dl),
-                        format_field_niches(&alt_layout, &fields, &dl),
-                    );
-
-                    if prefer_alt_layout {
-                        return Some(alt_layout);
+            // Don't try to calculate an end-biased layout for unsizable structs,
+            // otherwise we could end up with different layouts for
+            // Foo<Type> and Foo<dyn Trait> which would break unsizing
+            if !matches!(kind, StructKind::MaybeUnsized) {
+                if let Some(niche) = layout.largest_niche {
+                    let head_space = niche.offset.bytes();
+                    let niche_length = niche.value.size(dl).bytes();
+                    let tail_space = layout.size.bytes() - head_space - niche_length;
+
+                    // This may end up doing redundant work if the niche is already in the last field
+                    // (e.g. a trailing bool) and there is tail padding. But it's non-trivial to get
+                    // the unpadded size so we try anyway.
+                    if fields.len() > 1 && head_space != 0 && tail_space > 0 {
+                        let alt_layout = univariant(self, dl, fields, repr, kind, NicheBias::End)
+                            .expect("alt layout should always work");
+                        let niche = alt_layout
+                            .largest_niche
+                            .expect("alt layout should have a niche like the regular one");
+                        let alt_head_space = niche.offset.bytes();
+                        let alt_niche_len = niche.value.size(dl).bytes();
+                        let alt_tail_space =
+                            alt_layout.size.bytes() - alt_head_space - alt_niche_len;
+
+                        debug_assert_eq!(layout.size.bytes(), alt_layout.size.bytes());
+
+                        let prefer_alt_layout =
+                            alt_head_space > head_space && alt_head_space > tail_space;
+
+                        debug!(
+                            "sz: {}, default_niche_at: {}+{}, default_tail_space: {}, alt_niche_at/head_space: {}+{}, alt_tail: {}, num_fields: {}, better: {}\n\
+                            layout: {}\n\
+                            alt_layout: {}\n",
+                            layout.size.bytes(),
+                            head_space,
+                            niche_length,
+                            tail_space,
+                            alt_head_space,
+                            alt_niche_len,
+                            alt_tail_space,
+                            layout.fields.count(),
+                            prefer_alt_layout,
+                            format_field_niches(&layout, &fields, &dl),
+                            format_field_niches(&alt_layout, &fields, &dl),
+                        );
+
+                        if prefer_alt_layout {
+                            return Some(alt_layout);
+                        }
                     }
                 }
             }
@@ -828,6 +834,7 @@ fn univariant(
     if optimize && fields.len() > 1 {
         let end = if let StructKind::MaybeUnsized = kind { fields.len() - 1 } else { fields.len() };
         let optimizing = &mut inverse_memory_index.raw[..end];
+        let fields_excluding_tail = &fields.raw[..end];
 
         // If `-Z randomize-layout` was enabled for the type definition we can shuffle
         // the field ordering to try and catch some code making assumptions about layouts
@@ -844,8 +851,11 @@ fn univariant(
             }
             // Otherwise we just leave things alone and actually optimize the type's fields
         } else {
-            let max_field_align = fields.iter().map(|f| f.align().abi.bytes()).max().unwrap_or(1);
-            let largest_niche_size = fields
+            // To allow unsizing `&Foo<Type>` -> `&Foo<dyn Trait>`, the layout of the struct must
+            // not depend on the layout of the tail.
+            let max_field_align =
+                fields_excluding_tail.iter().map(|f| f.align().abi.bytes()).max().unwrap_or(1);
+            let largest_niche_size = fields_excluding_tail
                 .iter()
                 .filter_map(|f| f.largest_niche())
                 .map(|n| n.available(dl))

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs

@@ -362,7 +362,16 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                     continue;
                 }
 
-                let is_closure = matches!(arg.kind, ExprKind::Closure { .. });
+                // For this check, we do *not* want to treat async generator closures (async blocks)
+                // as proper closures. Doing so would regress type inference when feeding
+                // the return value of an argument-position async block to an argument-position
+                // closure wrapped in a block.
+                // See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112225>.
+                let is_closure = if let ExprKind::Closure(closure) = arg.kind {
+                    !tcx.generator_is_async(closure.def_id.to_def_id())
+                } else {
+                    false
+                };
                 if is_closure != check_closures {
                     continue;
                 }

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/check_alignment.rs

@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ pub struct CheckAlignment;
 
 impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for CheckAlignment {
     fn is_enabled(&self, sess: &Session) -> bool {
+        // FIXME(#112480) MSVC and rustc disagree on minimum stack alignment on x86 Windows
+        if sess.target.llvm_target == "i686-pc-windows-msvc" {
+            return false;
+        }
         sess.opts.debug_assertions
     }
 

src/librustdoc/html/render/mod.rs

@@ -1933,8 +1933,6 @@ pub(crate) fn small_url_encode(s: String) -> String {
             // While the same is not true for hashes, rustdoc only needs to be
             // consistent with itself when encoding them.
             st += "+";
-        } else if b == b'%' {
-            st += "%%";
         } else {
             write!(st, "%{:02X}", b).unwrap();
         }

tests/ui/async-await/issues/issue-112225-1.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// check-pass
+// edition:2021
+
+use core::future::Future;
+
+fn main() {
+    do_async(async { (0,) }, {
+        // closure must be inside block
+        |info| println!("{:?}", info.0)
+    });
+}
+
+fn do_async<R, Fut, F>(_tokio_fut: Fut, _glib_closure: F)
+where
+    Fut: Future<Output = R>,
+    F: FnOnce(R),
+{
+}

tests/ui/async-await/issues/issue-112225-2.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// edition:2021
+
+// With the current compiler logic, we cannot have both the `112225-1` case,
+// and this `112225-2` case working, as the type inference depends on the evaluation
+// order, and there is some explicit ordering going on.
+// See the `check_closures` part in `FnCtxt::check_argument_types`.
+// The `112225-1` case was a regression in real world code, whereas the `112225-2`
+// case never used to work prior to 1.70.
+
+use core::future::Future;
+
+fn main() {
+    let x = Default::default();
+    //~^ ERROR: type annotations needed
+    do_async(
+        async { x.0; },
+        { || { let _: &(i32,) = &x; } },
+    );
+}
+fn do_async<Fut, T>(_fut: Fut, _val: T, ) {}

tests/ui/async-await/issues/issue-112225-2.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+error[E0282]: type annotations needed
+  --> $DIR/issue-112225-2.rs:13:9
+   |
+LL |     let x = Default::default();
+   |         ^
+...
+LL |         async { x.0; },
+   |                 - type must be known at this point
+   |
+help: consider giving `x` an explicit type
+   |
+LL |     let x: /* Type */ = Default::default();
+   |          ++++++++++++
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0282`.

tests/ui/layout/issue-112048-unsizing-field-order.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// run-pass
+
+// Check that unsizing doesn't reorder fields.
+
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+
+use std::fmt::Debug;
+
+#[derive(Debug)]
+struct GcNode<T: ?Sized> {
+    gets_swapped_with_next: usize,
+    next: Option<&'static GcNode<dyn Debug>>,
+    tail: T,
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    let node: Box<GcNode<dyn Debug>> = Box::new(GcNode {
+        gets_swapped_with_next: 42,
+        next: None,
+        tail: Box::new(1),
+    });
+
+    assert_eq!(node.gets_swapped_with_next, 42);
+    assert!(node.next.is_none());
+}

tests/ui/layout/issue-112048-unsizing-niche.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// run-pass
+
+// Check that unsizing does not change which field is considered for niche layout.
+
+#![feature(offset_of)]
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+
+#[derive(Clone)]
+struct WideptrField<T: ?Sized> {
+    first: usize,
+    second: usize,
+    niche: NicheAtEnd,
+    tail: T,
+}
+
+#[derive(Clone)]
+#[repr(C)]
+struct NicheAtEnd {
+    arr: [u8; 7],
+    b: bool,
+}
+
+type Tail = [bool; 8];
+
+fn main() {
+    assert_eq!(
+        core::mem::offset_of!(WideptrField<Tail>, niche),
+        core::mem::offset_of!(WideptrField<dyn Send>, niche)
+    );
+}

tests/ui/mir/mir_alignment_check.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // run-fail
 // ignore-wasm32-bare: No panic messages
+// ignore-i686-pc-windows-msvc: #112480
 // compile-flags: -C debug-assertions
 // error-pattern: misaligned pointer dereference: address must be a multiple of 0x4 but is
 

tests/ui/mir/mir_alignment_check_i686-pc-windows-msvc.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// run-pass
+// only-i686-pc-windows-msvc
+// compile-flags: -Copt-level=0 -Cdebug-assertions=yes
+
+// MSVC isn't sure if on 32-bit Windows its u64 type is 8-byte-aligned or 4-byte-aligned.
+// So this test ensures that on i686-pc-windows-msvc, we do not insert a runtime check
+// that will fail on dereferencing of a pointer to u64 which is not 8-byte-aligned but is
+// 4-byte-aligned.
+
+#![feature(strict_provenance)]
+
+fn main() {
+    let mut x = [0u64; 2];
+    let ptr: *mut u8 = x.as_mut_ptr().cast::<u8>();
+    unsafe {
+        let misaligned = ptr.add(4).cast::<u64>();
+        assert!(misaligned.addr() % 8 != 0);
+        assert!(misaligned.addr() % 4 == 0);
+        *misaligned = 42;
+    }
+}