Add semver rule for lints

src/doc/semver-check/src/main.rs

@@ -31,11 +31,15 @@ fn doit() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error>> {
 
     loop {
         // Find a rust block.
-        let (block_start, run_program) = loop {
+        let (block_start, run_program, deny_warnings) = loop {
             match lines.next() {
                 Some((lineno, line)) => {
                     if line.trim().starts_with("```rust") && !line.contains("skip") {
-                        break (lineno + 1, line.contains("run-fail"));
+                        break (
+                            lineno + 1,
+                            line.contains("run-fail"),
+                            !line.contains("dont-deny"),
+                        );
                     }
                 }
                 None => return Ok(()),
@@ -73,7 +77,10 @@ fn doit() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error>> {
         }
         let join = |part: &[&str]| {
             let mut result = String::new();
-            result.push_str("#![allow(unused)]\n#![deny(warnings)]\n");
+            result.push_str("#![allow(unused)]\n");
+            if deny_warnings {
+                result.push_str("#![deny(warnings)]\n");
+            }
             result.push_str(&part.join("\n"));
             if !result.ends_with('\n') {
                 result.push('\n');

src/doc/src/reference/semver.md

@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ considered incompatible.
 * Tooling and environment compatibility
     * [Possibly-breaking: changing the minimum version of Rust required](#env-new-rust)
     * [Possibly-breaking: changing the platform and environment requirements](#env-change-requirements)
+    * [Minor: introducing new lints](#new-lints)
     * Cargo
         * [Minor: adding a new Cargo feature](#cargo-feature-add)
         * [Major: removing a Cargo feature](#cargo-feature-remove)
@@ -1164,6 +1165,60 @@ Mitigation strategies:
 * Document the platforms and environments you specifically support.
 * Test your code on a wide range of environments in CI.
 
+<a id="new-lints"></a>
+### Minor: introducing new lints
+
+Some changes to a library may cause new lints to be triggered in users of that library.
+This should generally be considered a compatible change.
+
+```rust,ignore,dont-deny
+// MINOR CHANGE
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+// Before
+pub fn foo() {}
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+// After
+#[deprecated]
+pub fn foo() {}
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+// Example use of the library that will safely work.
+
+fn main() {
+    updated_crate::foo(); // Warning: use of deprecated function
+}
+```
+
+Beware that it may be possible for this to technically cause a project to fail if they have explicitly denied the warning, and the updated crate is a direct dependency.
+Denying warnings should be done with care and the understanding that new lints may be introduced over time.
+However, library authors should be cautious about introducing new warnings and may want to consider the potential impact on their users.
+
+The following lints are examples of those that may be introduced when updating a dependency:
+
+* [`deprecated`][deprecated-lint] — Introduced when a dependency adds the [`#[deprecated]` attribute][deprecated] to an item you are using.
+* [`unused_must_use`] — Introduced when a dependency adds the [`#[must_use]` attribute][must-use-attr] to an item where you are not consuming the result.
+* [`unused_unsafe`] — Introduced when a dependency *removes* the `unsafe` qualifier from a function, and that is the only unsafe function called in an unsafe block.
+
+Additionally, updating `rustc` to a new version may introduce new lints.
+
+Transitive dependencies which introduce new lints should not usually cause a failure because Cargo uses [`--cap-lints`](../../rustc/lints/levels.html#capping-lints) to suppress all lints in dependencies.
+
+Mitigating strategies:
+* If you build with warnings denied, understand you may need to deal with resolving new warnings whenever you update your dependencies.
+  If using RUSTFLAGS to pass `-Dwarnings`, also add the `-A` flag to allow lints that are likely to cause issues, such as `-Adeprecated`.
+* Introduce deprecations behind a [feature][Cargo features].
+  For example `#[cfg_attr(feature = "deprecated", deprecated="use bar instead")]`.
+  Then, when you plan to remove an item in a future SemVer breaking change, you can communicate with your users that they should enable the `deprecated` feature *before* updating to remove the use of the deprecated items.
+  This allows users to choose when to respond to deprecations without needing to immediately respond to them.
+  A downside is that it can be difficult to communicate to users that they need to take these manual steps to prepare for a major update.
+
+[`unused_must_use`]: ../../rustc/lints/listing/warn-by-default.html#unused-must-use
+[deprecated-lint]: ../../rustc/lints/listing/warn-by-default.html#deprecated
+[must-use-attr]: ../../reference/attributes/diagnostics.html#the-must_use-attribute
+[`unused_unsafe`]: ../../rustc/lints/listing/warn-by-default.html#unused-unsafe
+
 ### Cargo
 
 <a id="cargo-feature-add"></a>