Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revive incremental compilation working group #299

Open
6 of 10 tasks
pnkfelix opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 3 comments
Open
6 of 10 tasks

Revive incremental compilation working group #299

pnkfelix opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

pnkfelix commented Jun 2, 2020

Adapting check-list of things to do from #282

  • Create (really, reusing pre-existing) Github label WG-incr-comp
    • Decide on what name to use. (I.e. whether to treat pre-existing WG-compilation-incr WG github label as overriding precedent, or use something else like WG-incr-comp to match up with A-incr-comp...)
  • Create Zulip stream #t-compiler/wg-incr-comp
  • Check if compiler team meeting pages for WG updates need any changes (didn't @spastorino add a magic number on @pnkfelix's suggestion to keep the near-term order stable when new WG's are added?)
  • Solicit membership from people who have expressed interest, have relevant expertise, etc. (This check box is "done when its done")
  • Write a guide giving some high-level guidelines like add cleanup crew rustc-dev-guide#556
  • Create the team toml file in team repo (see PR Create wg-incr-comp team#367)
  • Create a sample PR for adding yourself, similar to add nikomatsakis to LLVM ICE-breakers team#140
  • Link to the sample PR in this section of the rustc-guide
  • Write an announcement blog post
@spastorino
Copy link
Member

spastorino commented Jun 29, 2020

Check if compiler team meeting pages for WG updates need any changes (didn't @spastorino add a magic number on @pnkfelix's suggestion to keep the near-term order stable when new WG's are added?)

Going to check the box related to this thing. We do have a magic number so we have a way to adjust things.

@spastorino
Copy link
Member

Added the sample PR rust-lang/team#371

@spastorino
Copy link
Member

@pnkfelix going over this I think

Solicit membership from people who have expressed interest, have relevant expertise, etc. (This check box is "done when its done") is done
Write a guide giving some high-level guidelines like rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#556 unsure
Link to the sample PR in this section of the rustc-guide unsure about this
Write an announcement blog post I guess this is pending

But besides from that I'm not sure if all that stuff is needed?.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants