Promote tier 3 arm64e-apple-darwin target to tier 2

[aviramha]

Proposal

Promote arm64e-apple-darwin target to tier 2.

The changes of arm64e is LLVM/linker flags, doesn't introduce new code and is quite simple addition.

A tier 2 target must have value to people other than its maintainers. (It may still be a niche target, but it must not be exclusively useful for an inherently closed group.)

Developers can build arm64e binary libraries for distribution, while executable binaries are still limited to configured machines. Even so, starting to provide will help anyone who wants to build binary library that leverages arm64e, and prepare us for when we can build executables that can also run on vanilla macOS.

A tier 2 target must have a designated team of developers (the "target maintainers") available to consult on target-specific build-breaking issues, or if necessary to develop target-specific language or library implementation details. This team must have at least 2 developers.

The target maintainers should not only fix target-specific issues, but should use any such issue as an opportunity to educate the Rust community about portability to their target, and enhance documentation of the target.

There's one maintainer already, and I'm willing to step in as second one.

The target must not place undue burden on Rust developers not specifically concerned with that target. Rust developers are expected to not gratuitously break a tier 2 target, but are not expected to become experts in every tier 2 target, and are not expected to provide target-specific implementations for every tier 2 target.

These target is almost same as aarch64-apple-darwin which is tier 1, so there shouldn't be any burden.

The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target using cross-compilation, and explaining how to run tests for the target. If at all possible, this documentation should show how to run Rust programs and tests for the target using emulation, to allow anyone to do so. If the target cannot be feasibly emulated, the documentation should explain how to obtain and work with physical hardware, cloud systems, or equivalent.

Cross compilation and testing are explained on the targets page.

The target must document its baseline expectations for the features or versions of CPUs, operating systems, libraries, runtime environments, and similar.

The target specifies that it can work on any Darwin based machine with ARM CPU.

Tier 2 targets must not leave any significant portions of core or the standard library unimplemented or stubbed out, unless they cannot possibly be supported on the target.

No change from tier 1 Darwin target.

The code generation backend for the target should not have deficiencies that invalidate Rust safety properties, as evaluated by the Rust compiler team. (This requirement does not apply to arbitrary security enhancements or mitigations provided by code generation backends, only to those properties needed to ensure safe Rust code cannot cause undefined behavior or other unsoundness.) If this requirement does not hold, the target must clearly and prominently document any such limitations as part of the target's entry in the target tier list, and ideally also via a failing test in the testsuite. The Rust compiler team must be satisfied with the balance between these limitations and the difficulty of implementing the necessary features.

It doesn't.

If the target supports C code, and the target has an interoperable calling convention for C code, the Rust target must support that C calling convention for the platform via extern "C". The C calling convention does not need to be the default Rust calling convention for the target, however.

It does not differ from tier 1 Darwin targets.

The target must build reliably in CI, for all components that Rust's CI considers mandatory.

It builds reliably and I will send a PR to add it in CI once accepted.

The approving teams may additionally require that a subset of tests pass in CI, such as enough to build a functional "hello world" program, ./x.py test --no-run, or equivalent "smoke tests". In particular, this requirement may apply if the target builds host tools, or if the tests in question provide substantial value via early detection of critical problems.

This has the same limitiation aarch64 machines has - if there are tests that are ran I'd be happy to send similar for arm64e.

Building the target in CI must not take substantially longer than the current slowest target in CI, and should not substantially raise the maintenance burden of the CI infrastructure. This requirement is subjective, to be evaluated by the infrastructure team, and will take the community importance of the target into account.

Should be more or less same speed as aarch64-macos

Tier 2 targets should, if at all possible, support cross-compiling. Tier 2 targets should not require using the target as the host for builds, even if the target supports host tools.

This is supported.

In addition to the legal requirements for all targets (specified in the tier 3 requirements), because a tier 2 target typically involves the Rust project building and supplying various compiled binaries, incorporating the target and redistributing any resulting compiled binaries (e.g. built libraries, host tools if any) must not impose any onerous license requirements on any members of the Rust project, including infrastructure team members and those operating CI systems. This is a subjective requirement, to be evaluated by the approving teams.

I believe given it's more or less same as aarch64-macos, there shouldn't be any issue.

Tier 2 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to ensure that tests pass for the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on tests failing for the target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via @) to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding the PR breaking tests on a tier 2 target, unless they have opted into such messages.

Fully understood.

The target maintainers should regularly run the testsuite for the target, and should fix any test failures in a reasonably timely fashion.

Of course.

All requirements for tier 3 apply.

It's tier 3 already.

Mentors or Reviewers

If you have a reviewer or mentor in mind for this work, mention them here. You can put your own name here if you are planning to mentor the work.

Process

The main points of the Major Change Process are as follows:

• File an issue describing the proposal.
• A compiler team member or contributor who is knowledgeable in the area can second by writing @rustbot second.
• Finding a "second" suffices for internal changes. If however, you are proposing a new public-facing feature, such as a -C flag, then full team check-off is required.
• Compiler team members can initiate a check-off via @rfcbot fcp merge on either the MCP or the PR.
• Once an MCP is seconded, the Final Comment Period begins. If no objections are raised after 10 days, the MCP is considered approved.

You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.

Comments

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

[rustbot]

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

Concerns or objections to the proposal should be discussed on Zulip and formally registered here by adding a comment with the following syntax:

@rustbot concern reason-for-concern 
<description of the concern> 

Concerns can be lifted with:

@rustbot resolve reason-for-concern 

See documentation at https://forge.rust-lang.org

cc @rust-lang/compiler @rust-lang/compiler-contributors

[glandium]

Does arm64e-apple-ios need a separate MCP?

[apiraino]

Closing this MCP as it seems that support for this target should be first implemented by LLVM upstream. Until then we don't have the bits in places to make this a Tier 2 target (please review the discussion on Zulip).

Noteworthy in that discussion also the topic on how to exactly call this target, @aviramha you might want to have a look.