-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 353
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unsupported operation sqlite3_open_v2
#2325
Comments
I think the only way forward for this would be to change I mean, we do have #11 which would allow these things directly, but considering it has been untouched for years, it may take more years. |
Yeah, I should probably have worded this a bit more carefully in the blog post... we're not going to be able to implement Python, PHP, or sqlite in Miri. :/ |
That's totally understandable and that is what I've assumed anyway. I'm fine with closing this issue as out of scope ❤️ |
I guess to resolve this issue properly we should add something to https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md that says what things are in scope of miri and what are out of scope |
👀 maurer#1 |
Oh wow. oO |
Closing as we'll not implement this shim in Miri. |
update 'unsupported' message Instead of "the interpreter", just say Miri. Also be a more more clear about what is expected to be supported and what not (Cc #2325).
update 'unsupported' message Instead of "the interpreter", just say Miri. Also be a more more clear about what is expected to be supported and what not (Cc rust-lang/miri#2325).
update 'unsupported' message Instead of "the interpreter", just say Miri. Also be a more more clear about what is expected to be supported and what not (Cc rust-lang/miri#2325).
Motivated by Ralf Jung's blog post about the last 2 years of miri development I've tried to run diesels test suit using miri. Especially the sqlite backend does a lot of nasty pointer things, so another layer of checks beside asan and friends would be helpful. I run into the following error message:
I should note that I kind of expected that. I mainly raise this issue as the blog post explicitly calls for opening issues for unsupported operations.
Environment information:
rustc --version
:Steps to reproduce:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: