-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Private items with a public reexport could suggest the public path in privacy error message #13065
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
A-resolve
Area: Name/path resolution done by `rustc_resolve` specifically
C-enhancement
Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 7, 2014
This is the second step in implementing #13851. This PR cannot currently land until a snapshot exists with #13892, but I imagine that this review will take longer. This PR refactors a large amount of functionality outside of the standard library into a new library, libcore. This new library has 0 dependencies (in theory). In practice, this library currently depends on these symbols being available: * `rust_begin_unwind` and `rust_fail_bounds_check` - These are the two entry points of failure in libcore. The symbols are provided by libstd currently. In the future (see the bullets on #13851) this will be officially supported with nice error mesages. Additionally, there will only be one failure entry point once `std::fmt` migrates to libcore. * `memcpy` - This is often generated by LLVM. This is also quite trivial to implement for any platform, so I'm not too worried about this. * `memcmp` - This is required for comparing strings. This function is quite common *everywhere*, so I don't feel to bad about relying on a consumer of libcore to define it. * `malloc` and `free` - This is quite unfortunate, and is a temporary stopgap until we deal with the `~` situation. More details can be found in the module `core::should_not_exist` * `fmod` and `fmodf` - These exist because the `Rem` trait is defined in libcore, so the `Rem` implementation for floats must also be defined in libcore. I imagine that any platform using floating-point modulus will have these symbols anyway, and otherwise they will be optimized out. * `fdim` and `fdimf` - Like `fmod`, these are from the `Signed` trait being defined in libcore. I don't expect this to be much of a problem These dependencies all "Just Work" for now because libcore only exists as an rlib, not as a dylib. The commits themselves are organized to show that the overall diff of this extraction is not all that large. Most modules were able to be moved with very few modifications. The primary module left out of this iteration is `std::fmt`. I plan on migrating the `fmt` module to libcore, but I chose to not do so at this time because it had implications on the `Writer` trait that I wanted to deal with in isolation. There are a few breaking changes in these commits, but they are fairly minor, and are all labeled with `[breaking-change]`. The nastiest parts of this movement come up with `~[T]` and `~str` being language-defined types today. I believe that much of this nastiness will get better over time as we migrate towards `Vec<T>` and `Str` (or whatever the types will be named). There will likely always be some extension traits, but the situation won't be as bad as it is today. Known deficiencies: * rustdoc will get worse in terms of readability. This is the next issue I will tackle as part of #13851. If others think that the rustdoc change should happen first, I can also table this to fix rustdoc first. * The compiler reveals that all these types are reexports via error messages like `core::option::Option`. This is filed as #13065, and I believe that issue would have a higher priority now. I do not currently plan on fixing that as part of #13851. If others believe that this issue should be fixed, I can also place it on the roadmap for #13851. I recommend viewing these changes on a commit-by-commit basis. The overall change is likely too overwhelming to take in.
Triage: no change here, these kinds of messages still happen. |
Triage: no change |
Triage: no change |
Triage: no change |
Current output: no real change with use std::io::buffered::BufReader;
|
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust
that referenced
this issue
Aug 23, 2022
…kril document interaction of checkOnSave.overrideCommand and multiple linked projects Cc rust-lang/rust-analyzer#10793 r? `@Veykril`
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2024
Misc refactorings part 2 A couple of theses are a bit more involved. No behaviour changes included in this set. changelog: none
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
A-resolve
Area: Name/path resolution done by `rustc_resolve` specifically
C-enhancement
Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
E.g.
use std::io::buffered::BufferedReader;
saysstruct BufferedReader is private
but could say(This probably requires some significant work, for not a huge benefit.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: