-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
diagnostics: do not suggest static candidates as traits to import #103550
Merged
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
notriddle:notriddle/no-suggest-static-candidates
Oct 28, 2022
Merged
diagnostics: do not suggest static candidates as traits to import #103550
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
notriddle:notriddle/no-suggest-static-candidates
Oct 28, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If it's a static candidate, then it's already implemented. Do not suggest it a second time for implementing.
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
label
Oct 25, 2022
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @wesleywiser (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Oct 25, 2022
wesleywiser
approved these changes
Oct 27, 2022
Thanks @notriddle! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Oct 27, 2022
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2022
…tic-candidates, r=wesleywiser diagnostics: do not suggest static candidates as traits to import If it's a static candidate, then it's already implemented. Do not suggest it a second time for implementing. Partial fix for rust-lang#102354
This was referenced Oct 28, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#102642 (Add tests for static async functions in traits) - rust-lang#103283 (Add suggestions for unsafe impl error codes) - rust-lang#103523 (Fix unwanted merge of inline doc comments for impl blocks) - rust-lang#103550 (diagnostics: do not suggest static candidates as traits to import) - rust-lang#103641 (Don't carry MIR location in `ConstraintCategory::CallArgument`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If it's a static candidate, then it's already implemented. Do not suggest it a second time for implementing.
Partial fix for #102354