-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2 #103933
Conversation
r? @JohnTitor (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
📌 Commit 006e05aa1c3e418567c68a76993c809d5ca7eef2 has been approved by It is now in the queue for this repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Looks good!
+nightly \ | ||
xbuild \ | ||
--target x86_64-unknown-uefi | ||
```text |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was the change from sh
to text
intentional? The comments should work fine in sh
, shouldn't it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, fixed. (I had copy-pasted that from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95705/files#diff-7a14c39a7e2dc831476df3687623b15a8ac53450b9fe34769b1fba1fe4d16ef9R54)
006e05a
to
971a146
Compare
@bors r+ |
… r=JohnTitor Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2 MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#555 CC `@dvdhrm`
… r=JohnTitor Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2 MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#555 CC ``@dvdhrm``
… r=JohnTitor Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2 MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#555 CC ```@dvdhrm```
I think this is the one which failed in #104143 (comment). Please don't hesitate to re-r+ if my guess was wrong. @bors r- |
It looks like the job that failed was @rustbot ready |
I guess we'll know soon enough. I made another rollup with the |
The new rollup without this PR failed, looks like it's the same |
Absolutely! @bors r=JohnTitor |
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#103570 (Stabilize integer logarithms) - rust-lang#103694 (Add documentation examples for `pointer::mask`) - rust-lang#103919 (Unescaping cleanups) - rust-lang#103933 (Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2) - rust-lang#103952 (Don't intra linkcheck reference) - rust-lang#104111 (rustdoc: Add mutable to the description) - rust-lang#104125 (Const Compare for Tuples) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
… r=JohnTitor Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2 MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#555 CC `@dvdhrm`
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#103570 (Stabilize integer logarithms) - rust-lang#103694 (Add documentation examples for `pointer::mask`) - rust-lang#103919 (Unescaping cleanups) - rust-lang#103933 (Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2) - rust-lang#103952 (Don't intra linkcheck reference) - rust-lang#104111 (rustdoc: Add mutable to the description) - rust-lang#104125 (Const Compare for Tuples) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…iplett Mention UEFI target promotion in release notes for 1.67.0 The promotion happened in rust-lang#103933, but it was forgotten in the release notes for 1.67.0. See also discussion in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/241545-t-release/topic/UEFI.20targets.20relnotes
…iplett Mention UEFI target promotion in release notes for 1.67.0 The promotion happened in rust-lang#103933, but it was forgotten in the release notes for 1.67.0. See also discussion in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/241545-t-release/topic/UEFI.20targets.20relnotes
MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#555
CC @dvdhrm