-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Type-directed probing for inherent associated types #105961
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
488d0c9
Type-directed probing for inherent associated types
fmease aa7edf7
Use the correct ParamEnv
fmease cc65ebd
Make use of ObligationCtxt
fmease b5e73bf
Groundwork for detecting ambiguous candidates
fmease 3dc38fb
Switch from for-loop to filter_map
fmease 6065867
Use InferCtxt::probe to properly detect ambiguous candidates
fmease 77ea90e
Fix substitution bug
fmease 6eb6455
Add a test and several known bugs
fmease 569ca2b
Deduplicate fresh_item_substs
fmease 00b976a
Collect fulfillment errors across impls
fmease f2253da
Add some FIXMEs for follow-up PRs
fmease File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would make more sense to pass a
Vec<(DefId, (DefId, DefId), Option<Vec<FulfillmentError>>)>
.I see why checking if for
is_empty()
here is okay: basically, this is the case where all theSelf
types are different (which should be obvious by just enumerating the candidates). This could be the "simple path": if all the candidates have no fulfillment errors -> list (as is done now).Otherwise, for each candidate, list the unsatisfied bounds.