Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove BOOL_TY_FOR_UNIT_TESTING #107384

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

It is not used anymore for unit testing.

It is not used anymore for unit testing.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 27, 2023

r? @estebank

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 27, 2023
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jan 27, 2023

r=me with CI happy

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jan 27, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 27, 2023

📌 Commit 5152e84 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 27, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
…-obk

Remove `BOOL_TY_FOR_UNIT_TESTING`

It is not used anymore for unit testing.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2023
…-obk

Remove `BOOL_TY_FOR_UNIT_TESTING`

It is not used anymore for unit testing.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104012 (Improve unexpected close and mismatch delimiter hint in TokenTreesReader)
 - rust-lang#104252 (Stabilize the const_socketaddr feature)
 - rust-lang#105524 (Replace libc::{type} with crate::ffi::{type})
 - rust-lang#107096 (Detect references to non-existant messages in Fluent resources)
 - rust-lang#107355 (Add regression test for rust-lang#60755)
 - rust-lang#107384 (Remove `BOOL_TY_FOR_UNIT_TESTING`)
 - rust-lang#107385 (Use `FallibleTypeFolder` for `ConstInferUnifier` not `TypeRelation`)
 - rust-lang#107391 (rustdoc: remove inline javascript from copy-path button)
 - rust-lang#107398 (Remove `ControlFlow::{BREAK, CONTINUE}`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e0c8359 into rust-lang:master Jan 28, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Jan 28, 2023
@Noratrieb Noratrieb deleted the bool-for-deletion branch January 28, 2023 16:05
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104012 (Improve unexpected close and mismatch delimiter hint in TokenTreesReader)
 - rust-lang#104252 (Stabilize the const_socketaddr feature)
 - rust-lang#105524 (Replace libc::{type} with crate::ffi::{type})
 - rust-lang#107096 (Detect references to non-existant messages in Fluent resources)
 - rust-lang#107355 (Add regression test for rust-lang#60755)
 - rust-lang#107384 (Remove `BOOL_TY_FOR_UNIT_TESTING`)
 - rust-lang#107385 (Use `FallibleTypeFolder` for `ConstInferUnifier` not `TypeRelation`)
 - rust-lang#107391 (rustdoc: remove inline javascript from copy-path button)
 - rust-lang#107398 (Remove `ControlFlow::{BREAK, CONTINUE}`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants