-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
apply query response: actually define opaque types #108342
Conversation
@bors r+ Ah that explains it. We used to not run the infer var replacement for TAITs, so it worked before. But once I flipped the default to "not infer opaque types", this "regressed". I do wonder why we use the evaluate queries so little in typeck, but apparently do so for the return type @bors r+ rollup |
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
we only do it during mir typeck, hir typeck never uses canonical queries atm. I expect that by using the inference var replacement for opaques in the return type and so on, we tend to not have opaque types in the types of locals or sth 🤔 |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#107736 ( Rename atomic 'as_mut_ptr' to 'as_ptr' to match Cell (ref rust-lang#66893) ) - rust-lang#108176 (Don't delay `ReError` bug during lexical region resolve) - rust-lang#108315 (Lint dead code in closures and generators) - rust-lang#108342 (apply query response: actually define opaque types) - rust-lang#108344 (Fix test filename for rust-lang#105700) - rust-lang#108353 (resolve: Remove `ImportResolver`) Failed merges: - rust-lang#107911 (Add check for invalid #[macro_export] arguments) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
not sure whether this fixes any code considering that #107891 doesn't break anything, but this is currently wrong as the
eq
there should just always fail right now.We can definitely hit this code if we remove the
replace_opaque_types_with_inference_vars
hack. Doing so without this PR causes a few tests to ICE, e.g.rust/tests/ui/impl-trait/issue-99642.rs
Lines 1 to 7 in bd4a96a
r? @oli-obk