Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RPITITs are DefKind::Opaque with new lowering strategy #109405

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 22, 2023

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? @spastorino

Kinda cherry-picked #109400

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 20, 2023
@spastorino
Copy link
Member

You can probably grab my updated commit that includes your suggestion and we can close that other PR.

@spastorino
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors after you update my commit, feel free to r=me

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=spastorino

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2023

📌 Commit f7a5bc324c1a7e1be2ad0d52526ef488983729b4 has been approved by spastorino

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 20, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #109092) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 21, 2023
@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the rpitit-as-opaques branch from f7a5bc3 to c3e6f68 Compare March 21, 2023 23:41
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=spastorino

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 22, 2023

📌 Commit c3e6f68 has been approved by spastorino

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 22, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#100311 (Fix handling of trailing bare CR in str::lines)
 - rust-lang#108997 (Change text -> rust highlighting in sanitizer.md)
 - rust-lang#109179 (move Option::as_slice to intrinsic)
 - rust-lang#109187 (Render source page layout with Askama)
 - rust-lang#109280 (Remove `VecMap`)
 - rust-lang#109295 (refactor `fn bootstrap::builder::Builder::compiler_for` logic)
 - rust-lang#109312 (rustdoc: Cleanup parent module tracking for doc links)
 - rust-lang#109317 (Update links for custom discriminants.)
 - rust-lang#109405 (RPITITs are `DefKind::Opaque` with new lowering strategy)
 - rust-lang#109414 (Do not consider synthesized RPITITs on missing items checks)
 - rust-lang#109435 (Detect uninhabited types early in const eval)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b9151b2 into rust-lang:master Mar 22, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 22, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the rpitit-as-opaques branch August 11, 2023 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants