Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

do not allow inference in predicate_must_hold #109558

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented Mar 24, 2023

r? types

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 24, 2023
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ fn main() {

let z: AtomicU32 = 1;
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
//~| HELP call `Into::into` on this expression to convert `{integer}` into `AtomicU32`
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

annoying, we don't have a placeholder for {integer} 🤔 maybe we should instead evaluate and then check whether anything has been constrained?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 7, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #110036) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@compiler-errors compiler-errors self-assigned this Apr 7, 2023
@jackh726 jackh726 removed their assignment Apr 9, 2023
@lcnr lcnr closed this Apr 10, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
…old, r=jackh726

do not allow inference in `predicate_must_hold` (alternative approach)

See the FCP description for more info, but tl;dr is that we should not return `EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions` if an obligation may hold only with some choice of inference vars being constrained.

Attempts to solve this in the approach laid out by lcnr here: rust-lang#109558 (comment), rather than by eagerly replacing infer vars with placeholders which is a bit too restrictive.

r? `@ghost`
oli-obk pushed a commit to oli-obk/miri that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
…ckh726

do not allow inference in `predicate_must_hold` (alternative approach)

See the FCP description for more info, but tl;dr is that we should not return `EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions` if an obligation may hold only with some choice of inference vars being constrained.

Attempts to solve this in the approach laid out by lcnr here: rust-lang/rust#109558 (comment), rather than by eagerly replacing infer vars with placeholders which is a bit too restrictive.

r? `@ghost`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants