-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Limit to one link job on mingw builders #109643
Conversation
This is another attempt to work around rust-lang#108227. By limiting to one link job, we should be able to avoid file name clashes in mkstemp().
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors r+ p=100 |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (1d58207): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. |
@pietroalbini I might suggest backporting this to beta to reduce the trouble with trying to land PRs. |
…troalbini [stable] Prepare Rust 1.69.0 Last minute backports: * rust-lang#109643 * rust-lang#110135 * rust-lang#109938 * rust-lang#109937 * rust-lang#109266 This PR also bumps the channel to stable, and backports the release notes from master. r? `@ghost` cc `@rust-lang/release`
This is another attempt to work around
#108227.
By limiting to one link job, we should be able to avoid file name clashes in mkstemp().