Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns lint span #109838

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2023

Conversation

clubby789
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #109837

DUMMY_SP was being passed as the span in many cases where we have a span available to use. This meant that the location of the violating pattern wasn't shown, or the list of un-covered variants

r? @Nilstrieb

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 1, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 2, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #109836) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@clubby789 clubby789 force-pushed the non-exhaustive-span branch from 1d5c4e2 to 696f182 Compare April 2, 2023 15:37
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 4, 2023

📌 Commit 696f182 has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 4, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#109723 (Pull some tuple variant fields out into their own struct)
 - rust-lang#109838 (Fix `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint span)
 - rust-lang#109901 (Enforce VarDebugInfo::Place in MIR validation.)
 - rust-lang#109913 (Doc-comment  `IndexVec::from_elem` and use it in a few more places)
 - rust-lang#109914 (Emit feature error for parenthesized generics in associated type bounds)
 - rust-lang#109919 (rustdoc: escape GAT args in more cases)
 - rust-lang#109937 (Don't collect return-position impl traits for documentation)
 - rust-lang#109938 (Move a const-prop-lint specific hack from mir interpret to const-prop-lint and make it fallible)
 - rust-lang#109940 (Add regression test for rust-lang#93911)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4d32de6 into rust-lang:master Apr 4, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns is missing span
4 participants