-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 8 pull requests #110308
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 8 pull requests #110308
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi <[email protected]>
this test was added for rust 0.4 and doesn't test anything specific. The repro originally relied on extern functions which are now just ordinary methods. It's also a run pass test even though `main` has been commented out.
This is necessary for the subsequent commits.
So that people have to keep them sorted in future.
Re-phrase in a way that handles input values being either 0 or negative.
…rename usages of bound_impl_subject to impl_subject
…re, r=compiler-errors suggest lifetime for closure parameter type when mismatch This is a draft PR, will add test cases later and be ready for review. This PR fixes rust-lang#105675 by adding a diagnostics suggestion. Also a partial fix to rust-lang#105528. The following code will have a compile error now: ``` fn const_if_unit(input: bool) -> impl for<'a> FnOnce(&'a ()) -> usize { let x = |_| 1; x } ``` Before this PR: ``` error[E0308]: mismatched types --> src/lib.rs:3:5 | 3 | x | ^ one type is more general than the other | = note: expected trait `for<'a> FnOnce<(&'a (),)>` found trait `FnOnce<(&(),)>` note: this closure does not fulfill the lifetime requirements --> src/lib.rs:2:13 | 2 | let x = |_| 1; | ^^^ error: implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough --> src/lib.rs:3:5 | 3 | x | ^ implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough | = note: closure with signature `fn(&'2 ()) -> usize` must implement `FnOnce<(&'1 (),)>`, for any lifetime `'1`... = note: ...but it actually implements `FnOnce<(&'2 (),)>`, for some specific lifetime `'2` For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`. error: could not compile `rust-test` due to 2 previous errors ``` After this PR: ``` error[E0308]: mismatched types --> src/lib.rs:3:5 | 3 | x | ^ one type is more general than the other | = note: expected trait `for<'a> FnOnce<(&'a (),)>` found trait `FnOnce<(&(),)>` note: this closure does not fulfill the lifetime requirements --> src/lib.rs:2:13 | 2 | let x = |_| 1; | ^^^ help: consider changing the type of the closure parameters | 2 | let x = |_: &_| 1; | ~~~~~~~ error: implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough --> src/lib.rs:3:5 | 3 | x | ^ implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough | = note: closure with signature `fn(&'2 ()) -> usize` must implement `FnOnce<(&'1 (),)>`, for any lifetime `'1`... = note: ...but it actually implements `FnOnce<(&'2 (),)>`, for some specific lifetime `'2` For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`. error: could not compile `rust-test` due to 2 previous errors ``` After applying the suggestion, it compiles. The suggestion might not always be correct as the generation procedure of that suggestion is quite simple...
…14,albertlarsan68 Create "suggested tests" tool in `rustbuild` Not the claimed person in rust-lang#97339 but: I've done a very rough implementation of this feature in-tree. I'm very new to `rustc` development (outside of docs) so some help would be greatly appreciated. The UI of this new subcommand obviously will change and I need some mentoring with the `--run` flag. r? ``@jyn514``
Remove obsolete test case This test case was supposed to cover issue rust-lang#31109 at some point. It never did anything, as the issue was still open at the time of its creation. When the issue was resolved, the `issue31109` test case was created, making the existence of this test pointless.
don't uniquify regions when canonicalizing uniquifying causes a bunch of issues, most notably it causes `AliasEq(<?x as Trait<'a>>::Assoc, <?x as Trait<'a>>::Assoc)` to result in ambiguity because both `normalizes-to` paths result in ambiguity and substs equate should trivially succeed but doesn't because we uniquified `'a` to two different regions. I originally added uniquification to make it easier to deal with requirement 6 from the dev-guide: https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/solve/trait-solving.html#requirements > ### 6. Trait solving must be (free) lifetime agnostic > > Trait solving during codegen should have the same result as during typeck. As we erase > all free regions during codegen we must not rely on them during typeck. A noteworthy example > is special behavior for `'static`. cc rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1671 Relying on regions being identical may cause ICE during MIR typeck, but even without this PR we can end up relying on that as type inference vars can resolve to types which contain an identical region. Let's land this and deal with any ICE that crop up as we go. Will look at this issue again before stabilization. r? `@compiler-errors`
Add `tidy-alphabetical` to features in `core` So that people have to keep them sorted in future, rather than just sticking them on the end where they conflict more often.
…h726 Remove all but one of the spans in `BoundRegionKind::BrAnon` There are only three places where `BoundRegionKind::BrAnon` uses `Some(span)` instead of `None`. Two of them are easy to remove, which this PR does. r? `@jackh726`
…ses, r=thomcc Cover edge cases for {f32, f64}.hypot() docs Fixes rust-lang#88944 The Euclidean distance is a more general way to express what these functions do, and covers the edge cases of zero and negative inputs. Does not cover the case of non-normal input values (as the [POSIX docs](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2008edition/) do), but the docs for the rest of the functions in these modules do not address this, I assumed it was not desired.
…ct, r=compiler-errors Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `impl_subject` query Part of the work to finish rust-lang#105779. Several queries `X` have a `bound_X` variant that wraps the output in `EarlyBinder`. This adds `EarlyBinder` to the return type of the `impl_subject` query and removes `bound_impl_subject`. r? `@lcnr`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Apr 14, 2023
rustbot
added
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Apr 14, 2023
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Apr 14, 2023
⌛ Testing commit 8f7b5fc with merge e13e607c926b429967c1f3510ec2c66edd2698e7... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Apr 14, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
rustbuild
#106249 (Create "suggested tests" tool inrustbuild
)tidy-alphabetical
to features incore
#110269 (Addtidy-alphabetical
to features incore
)BoundRegionKind::BrAnon
#110276 (Remove all but one of the spans inBoundRegionKind::BrAnon
)EarlyBinder
forimpl_subject
query #110299 (Switch toEarlyBinder
forimpl_subject
query)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup