-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #111464
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #111464
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
use implied bounds when checking opaque types During opaque type inference, we check for the well-formedness of the hidden type in the opaque type's own environment, not the one of the defining site, which are different in the case of TAIT. However in the case of associated-type-impl-trait, we don't use implied bounds from the impl header. This caused us to reject the following: ```rust trait Service<Req> { type Output; fn call(req: Req) -> Self::Output; } impl<'a, Req> Service<&'a Req> for u8 { type Output= impl Sized; // we can't prove WF of hidden type `WF(&'a Req)` although it's implied by the impl //~^ ERROR type parameter Req doesn't live long enough fn call(req: &'a Req) -> Self::Output { req } } ``` although adding an explicit bound would make it pass: ```diff - impl<'a, Req> Service<&'a Req> for u8 { + impl<'a, Req> Service<&'a Req> for u8 where Req: 'a, { ``` I believe it should pass as we already allow the concrete type to be used: ```diff impl<'a, Req> Service<&'a Req> for u8 { - type Output= impl Sized; + type Output= &'a Req; ``` Fixes rust-lang#95922 Builds on rust-lang#105982 cc `@lcnr` (because implied bounds) r? `@oli-obk`
…i-obk Don't lint snake-case on executable crate name Fix rust-lang#45127 Hi, First PR on Rust, I tried my best to follow "Rust Compiler Development Guide". I tested it with a custom toolchain on a dummy bin crate with one submodule and it seems to work. The lint `non_snake_case` ignore the binary crate name but not the module name. Thank you `@Manishearth` and `@jyn514` for the guidance !
…r=lcnr Make `NonUseContext::AscribeUserTy` carry `ty::Variance` Close rust-lang#108267
Verify copies of mutable pointers in 2 stages in ReferencePropagation Fixes rust-lang#111422 In the first stage, we mark the copies as reborrows, to be checked later. In the second stage, we walk the reborrow chains to verify that all stages are fully replacable. The replacement itself mirrors the check, and iterates through the reborrow chain. r? `@RalfJung` cc `@JakobDegen`
Only warn single-use lifetime when the binders match. Fixes rust-lang#111400
Update cargo 2 commits in 26b73d15a68fb94579f6d3590585ec0e9d81d3d5..13413c64ff88dd6c2824e9eb9374fc5f10895d28 2023-05-09 20:28:03 +0000 to 2023-05-10 13:46:18 +0000 * Update libc to 0.2.144 (rust-lang/cargo#12098) * changelog: add entries of some behavior changes (rust-lang/cargo#12119) r? `@weihanglo`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
May 11, 2023
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 11, 2023
⌛ Testing commit 5f66444 with merge 0f1677ffa81b7491b2df76338b9b93b73e244825... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
May 11, 2023
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 11, 2023
This was referenced May 11, 2023
@bors p=101 |
⌛ Testing commit 5f66444 with merge 017120df8e1eb519d0a076825f73c35fd843f8a1... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
May 11, 2023
This was referenced May 11, 2023
This was referenced May 11, 2023
@bors treeclosed- |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
NonUseContext::AscribeUserTy
carryty::Variance
#111366 (MakeNonUseContext::AscribeUserTy
carryty::Variance
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup