Rollup of 7 pull requests #112164
Merged
Rollup of 7 pull requests #112164
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Designing a good hover microinteraction is a matter of guessing user intent from what are, literally, vague gestures. In this case, guessing if hovering in our out of the tooltip base is intentional or not. To figure this out, a few different techniques are used: * When the mouse pointer enters a tooltip anchor point, its hitbox is grown on the bottom, where the popover is/will appear. This was already there before this commit: search "hover tunnel" in rustdoc.css for the implementation. * This commit adds a delay when the mouse pointer enters the base anchor, in case the mouse pointer was just passing through and the user didn't want to open it. * This commit also adds a delay when the mouse pointer exits the tooltip's base anchor or its popover, before hiding it. * A fade-out animation is layered onto the pointer exit delay to immediately inform the user that they successfully dismissed the popover, while still providing a way for them to cancel it if it was a mistake and they still wanted to interact with it. * No animation is used for revealing it, because we don't want people to try to interact with an element while it's in the middle of fading in: either they're allowed to interact with it while it's fading in, meaning it can't serve as mistake- proofing for opening the popover, or they can't, but they might try and be frustrated. See also: * https://www.nngroup.com/articles/timing-exposing-content/ * https://www.nngroup.com/articles/tooltip-guidelines/ * https://bjk5.com/post/44698559168/breaking-down-amazons-mega-dropdown
We record inlining status for mono items in `MonoItems`, and then transfer it to `InliningMap`, for later use in `InliningMap::with_inlining_candidates`. But we can just compute inlining status directly in `InliningMap::with_inlining_candidates`, because the mono item is right there. There's no need to compute it in advance. This commit changes the code to do that, removing the need for `MonoItems` and `InliningMap::inlines`. This does result in more calls to `instantiation_mode` (one per static occurrence) but the performance effect is negligible.
These tend to have special handling in a bunch of places anyway, so the variant helps remember that. And I think it's easier to grok than non-Scalar Aggregates sometimes being `Immediates` (like I got wrong and caused 109992). As a minor bonus, it means we don't need to generate poison LLVM values for them to pass around in `OperandValue::Immediate`s.
…tch, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching It currently just uses the first link with the same href which might not necessarily be the matching one. This fixes replacements when there are several links to the same item but with different text (e.g. `[X] and [struct@X]`). It also fixes replacements in summaries since those use a links list with empty hrefs, so currently all links would always match the first link by href but then not match its text. This could also lead to a panic in the `original_lext[1..len() - 1]` part when the first link only has a single character, which is why the new code uses `.get(..)` instead.
…ompiler-errors Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs These tend to have special handling in a bunch of places anyway, so the variant helps remember that. And I think it's easier to grok than `Aggregate`s sometimes being `Immediates` (after all, I previously got that wrong and caused rust-lang#109992). As a minor bonus, it means we don't need to generate poison LLVM values for ZSTs to pass around in `OperandValue::Immediate`s. Inspired by rust-lang#110021 (comment), so r? `@compiler-errors`
…p, r=me,GuillaumeGomez,Manishearth rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers Preview: * [notable traits](http://notriddle.com/rustdoc-demo-html-3/delay-tooltip/testing/struct.Vec.html#method.iter) * [panicking code block](http://notriddle.com/rustdoc-demo-html-3/delay-tooltip/testing/struct.Vec.html#indexing) Designing a good hover microinteraction is a matter of guessing user intent from what are, literally, vague gestures. In this case, guessing if hovering in our out of the tooltip base is intentional or not. To figure this out, a few different techniques are used: * When the mouse pointer enters a tooltip anchor point, its hitbox is grown on the bottom, where the popover is/will appear. This was already there before this commit: search "hover tunnel" in rustdoc.css for the implementation. * This commit adds a delay when the mouse pointer enters the base anchor, in case the mouse pointer was just passing through and the user didn't want to open it. * This commit also adds a delay when the mouse pointer exits the tooltip's base anchor or its popover, before hiding it. * A fade-out animation is layered onto the pointer exit delay to immediately inform the user that they successfully dismissed the popover, while still providing a way for them to cancel it if it was a mistake and they still wanted to interact with it. * No animation is used for revealing it, because we don't want people to try to interact with an element while it's in the middle of fading in: either they're allowed to interact with it while it's fading in, meaning it can't serve as mistake- proofing for opening the popover, or they can't, but they might try and be frustrated. See also: * https://www.nngroup.com/articles/timing-exposing-content/ * https://www.nngroup.com/articles/tooltip-guidelines/ * https://bjk5.com/post/44698559168/breaking-down-amazons-mega-dropdown
…=lcnr Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results This means that we now prepopulate MIR with opaques with the right substs. The first commit is a hack that I think we discussed, having to do with `DefiningAnchor::Bubble` basically being equivalent to `DefiningAnchor::Error` in the new solver, so having to use `DefiningAnchor::Bind` instead, lol. r? `@lcnr`
…em, r=WaffleLapkin Don't suggest break through nested items Fixes rust-lang#112020
…=wesleywiser Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance. We record inlining status for mono items in `MonoItems`, and then transfer it to `InliningMap`, for later use in `InliningMap::with_inlining_candidates`. But we can just compute inlining status directly in `InliningMap::with_inlining_candidates`, because the mono item is right there. There's no need to compute it in advance. This commit changes the code to do that, removing the need for `MonoItems` and `InliningMap::inlines`. This does result in more calls to `instantiation_mode` (one per static occurrence) but the performance effect is negligible. r? ``@wesleywiser``
…=thomcc remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix rust-lang#111655 remove the text stating that `?` uses `Into::into` and add text stating it uses `From::from` instead. This closes rust-lang#111655.
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR: previous master: 23f93a1266 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (fabf929): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 642.933s -> 643.626s (0.11%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
OperandValue::ZeroSizedvariant for ZSTs #111318 (Add a distinctOperandValue::ZeroSizedvariant for ZSTs)?usesIntoon the underlying error type #111655)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup