-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: merge msvc
test CI jobs
#112633
CI: merge msvc
test CI jobs
#112633
Conversation
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r? @jyn514 |
@bors r+ rollup=iffy |
We should probably also resolve this somehow (if testing |
you could run |
yeah it would be nice to delete things from the makefile if possible, they end up being user facing but i don't want anyone relying on the existance of a random mingw rule |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (f9097f8): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 647.802s -> 648.042s (0.04%) |
Test `x.ps1` in `msvc` CI job Small adjustment to rust-lang#112633, to resolve [this comment](rust-lang#112633 (comment)). r? `@pietroalbini`
CI: merge `mingw` test CI jobs Same as rust-lang#112633, but for `mingw`. From the logs it looks like the runner spends 40 minutes compiling `rustc`, and then `10`/`20` minutes running tests. It seems wasteful to split that into two jobs. CI run: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/5275702134/jobs/9541479343?pr=112645 r? `@jyn514`
Test `x.ps1` in `msvc` CI job Small adjustment to rust-lang#112633, to resolve [this comment](rust-lang#112633 (comment)). r? `@pietroalbini`
CI: merge `mingw` test CI jobs Same as rust-lang/rust#112633, but for `mingw`. From the logs it looks like the runner spends 40 minutes compiling `rustc`, and then `10`/`20` minutes running tests. It seems wasteful to split that into two jobs. CI run: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/5275702134/jobs/9541479343?pr=112645 r? `@jyn514`
Merges
msvc
jobs together to save CI time. Currently, both runners take about 1h 15 minutes, but nowadays it should be possible to just run everything in a single job.CI run: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/5272144087/jobs/9534015536?pr=112633 (both finish under ~1h 35 minutes)
After this change, we no longer test both
x.py
andx.ps1
, but I don't suppose that it's worth it to spend 1.5 hours of additional CI time just for that. I suggest to run all tests using e.g.x.py
and then run justx.ps1 test --stage 2 --force-rerun tests/<single-quick-test>
.Also I'm not sure if it's worth it to keep using the Makefile for this.