-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update rustix #113276
Update rustix #113276
Conversation
The issue has been fixed.
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. |
@bors r+ rollup=iffy |
"errno", | ||
"errno-dragonfly", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, probably that's why it appears here https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113449/files#diff-1b98ff2ba41d961103aadb79662434330725d9503ca09496820a171d37390a95
At least one of reasons.
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (f05d743): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 655.53s -> 655.641s (0.02%) |
The issue has been fixed.
bytecodealliance/rustix#716