-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add even more GHA log groups #113514
Add even more GHA log groups #113514
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
// https://github.com/actions/toolkit/issues/1001 | ||
assert!( | ||
!GROUP_ACTIVE.swap(true, Ordering::Relaxed), | ||
"nested groups are not supported by GHA!" | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I should probably do this in ui_test, too
@bors r+ rollup wow, logs look so accessible now |
Add even more GHA log groups This also adds a dynamic check that we don't emit nested groups, since GHA currently doesn't support them. r? `@oli-obk`
Add even more GHA log groups This also adds a dynamic check that we don't emit nested groups, since GHA currently doesn't support them. r? ``@oli-obk``
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #113214) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@bors r=oli-obk rollup=iffy |
📌 Commit db2853fe97f9897a3374d0f367eed48db0520619 has been approved by It is now in the queue for this repository. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #113676) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
⌛ Testing commit 3a0caed with merge 4888db91469c3e293a7ad1ba5ceae2649821da6c... |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Update is not a fast forward |
Finished benchmarking commit (4888db91469c3e293a7ad1ba5ceae2649821da6c): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 657.64s -> 659.449s (0.28%) |
try build got merged and this was tested before the tree was closed 😞 bef6ff6 https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/Cannot.20get.20rust-dev-nightly.20from.20ci-artifacts.2Erust-lang.2Eorg |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (4d6e426): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDEDNext Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 657.64s -> 657.725s (0.01%) |
this doesn't affect how the compiler was built at all, the perf regression must be spurious. |
I agree. Marking as triaged. @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged |
This also adds a dynamic check that we don't emit nested groups, since GHA currently doesn't support them.
r? @oli-obk