Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format #115700

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2023
Merged

Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format #115700

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2023

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Follow-up of #111459.

r? @notriddle

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 9, 2023
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 9, 2023

📌 Commit a0aa59c has been approved by notriddle

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 9, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 9, 2023

⌛ Testing commit a0aa59c with merge 58b4ebc...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 9, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: notriddle
Pushing 58b4ebc to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 9, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 58b4ebc into rust-lang:master Sep 9, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 9, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the migrate-gui-test-color-39 branch September 9, 2023 18:25
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (58b4ebc): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 3.3% [3.3%, 3.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 3.1% [2.3%, 3.9%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 - - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.3% [3.3%, 3.3%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 630.442s -> 626.843s (-0.57%)
Artifact size: 317.88 MiB -> 317.92 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@notriddle notriddle

Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.74.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@GuillaumeGomez @notriddle @bors @rust-timer @rustbot