Add 1.74 release notes #116778
Add 1.74 release notes #116778
Conversation
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
| - [Replace `private_in_public` lint with `private_interfaces` and `private_bounds` per RFC 2145](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113126/) | ||
| Read more in [RFC 2145](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2145-type-privacy.html). | ||
| - [Allow explicit `#[repr(Rust)]`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114201/) | ||
| - [closure field capturing: don't depend on alignment of packed fields](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115315/) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - [closure field capturing: don't depend on alignment of packed fields](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115315/) | |
| - [closure field capturing: don't depend on alignment of packed fields](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115315/) | |
| - [Stabilize `impl_trait_projections`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115659) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How did that miss getting a milestone? (now fixed)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Mark-Simulacrum your last force-push appears to have lost this addition.
| - [Raise minimum supported Apple OS versions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104385/) | ||
| - [make Cell::swap panic if the Cells partially overlap](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114795/) | ||
| - [Reject invalid crate names in `--extern`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116001/) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
New compat note for #117054:
| - [The new `impl From<{&,&mut} [T; N]> for Vec<T>` is known to cause some inference failures with overly-generic code.](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117054) In those examples using the `tui` crate, the combination of `AsRef<_>` and `Into<Vec>` leaves the middle type ambiguous, and the new `impl` adds another possibility, so it now requires an explicit type annotation. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Mark-Simulacrum this too was lost in the force push.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have opened a PR to add them back.
#117917
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
relnotes
branch
from
8af1c15 to
43af732
Compare
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
relnotes
branch
from
901cfee to
ff7c684
Compare
|
Updated with stabilizations and resolved comments. @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (2b603f9): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 675.185s -> 674.176s (-0.15%) |
r? @cuviper @rust-lang/release