Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use elaboration to turn ~const bounds into non-const bounds #116872

Closed

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Feels slightly less ad-hoc, and is an attempt at this comment: #116756 (comment)

The only thing that I don't like is the filtering in one_bound_for_assoc_type -- I wonder if I should filter somewhere else?

r? @fee1-dead or @oli-obk

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 18, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the elaborate-host-effect branch from d215b0b to 3dd95d2 Compare October 18, 2023 03:21
Comment on lines -224 to +231
// HACK(eddyb) should get the original `Span`.
let span = tcx.def_span(def_id);
ty::GenericPredicates {
parent: None,
predicates: tcx.arena.alloc_from_iter(
self.param_env.caller_bounds().iter().filter_map(|predicate| {
match predicate.kind().skip_binder() {
ty::ClauseKind::Trait(data) if data.self_ty().is_param(index) => {
// HACK(eddyb) should get the original `Span`.
let span = tcx.def_span(def_id);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be reverted?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Oct 18, 2023

The only thing that I don't like is the filtering in one_bound_for_assoc_type -- I wonder if I should filter somewhere else?

😅 this is the same thing I had in my own attempt at effect generics last year. I'll compare the impls to see if I found some other subtle issues due to the higher test coverage compared to the current effects impl

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #116885) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 21, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

This is superseded (in the other direction) by #119721.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants