Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 3 pull requests #118493

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 3 pull requests #118493

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki commented Dec 1, 2023

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

notriddle and others added 6 commits November 30, 2023 10:43
This is about equally readable, a lot more terse, and stops
special-casing functions and methods.

```console
$ du -hs doc-old/ doc-new/
671M    doc-old/
670M    doc-new/
```
…=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: `div.where` instead of fmt-newline class

This is about equally readable, a lot more terse, and stops special-casing functions and methods.

```console
$ du -hs doc-old/ doc-new/
671M    doc-old/
670M    doc-new/
```
…rrors

generic_const_exprs: suggest to add the feature, not use it

Usually our missing feature messages look something like
```
  = help: add `#![feature(inline_const)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
However `generic_const_exprs` used a different verb. That's inconsistent and it also means playground won't add that nice hyperlink to add the feature automatically. So let's use the same verb as everywhere else.
Wesley is on vacation

OOF until Dec-11 🏖️
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 1, 2023
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Dec 1, 2023

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 1, 2023

📌 Commit 65026fa has been approved by TaKO8Ki

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 1, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 1, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 65026fa with merge 9bf30eb...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 1, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: TaKO8Ki
Pushing 9bf30eb to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 1, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 9bf30eb into rust-lang:master Dec 1, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Dec 1, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#118483 rustdoc: div.where instead of fmt-newline class 4e4fe74c3299d876760c0762697f305f4ce16eca (link)
#118486 generic_const_exprs: suggest to add the feature, not use it a842a3e93b26a42e02ba700c74d0e3206c1a8ed7 (link)
#118489 Wesley is on vacation 8ce1600d4a28106346033f33bc66f2fb6facdeb9 (link)

previous master: a1c65db95c

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (9bf30eb): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.0% [2.4%, 3.6%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.6% [-2.6%, -2.6%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 671.079s -> 672.931s (0.28%)
Artifact size: 313.33 MiB -> 313.36 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants