Assert that params with the same *index* have the same *name* #120619
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @BoxyUwU (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
Type relation code was changed |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
param
branch
from
35daecc to
1abd0da
Compare
compiler-errors
changed the title
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
Assert that params with the same *index* have the same *name* Found this bug when trying to build libcore with the new solver, since it will canonicalize two params with the same index into *different* placeholders if those params differ by name.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#113833 (`std::error::Error` -> Trait Implementations: lifetimes consistency improvement) - rust-lang#115386 (PartialEq, PartialOrd: update and synchronize handling of transitive chains) - rust-lang#116284 (make matching on NaN a hard error, and remove the rest of illegal_floating_point_literal_pattern) - rust-lang#118960 (Add LocalWaker and ContextBuilder types to core, and LocalWake trait to alloc.) - rust-lang#120384 (Use `<T, U>` for array/slice equality `impl`s) - rust-lang#120518 (riscv only supports split_debuginfo=off for now) - rust-lang#120619 (Assert that params with the same *index* have the same *name*) - rust-lang#120657 (Remove unused struct) - rust-lang#120661 (target: default to the medium code model on LoongArch targets) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
seems like rustdoc actually triggers this assert rn? |
|
r? @lcnr |
|
Rustdoc needs to stop using the wrong damn param-env 💀 |
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
param
branch
from
1abd0da to
c80c836
Compare
|
@rustbot ready |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-author
|
r=me after perf |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (1a2b8c3): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDEDBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 662.945s -> 663.369s (0.06%) |
|
@bors r=lcnr rollup=never |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged an expected rustdoc perf regression. Rustdoc was using the wrong |
rustbot
added
the
perf-regression-triaged
|
this is a bugfix in rustdoc and I don't see how these perf regressions can be avoided while still doing the correct thing. We need the correct @bors r+ rollup=never |
|
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
Assert that params with the same *index* have the same *name* Found this bug when trying to build libcore with the new solver, since it will canonicalize two params with the same index into *different* placeholders if those params differ by name.
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors retry invalid r_symbolnum=14 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
3 tasks
|
Finished benchmarking commit (520b0b2): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDEDNext Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 664.283s -> 666.51s (0.34%) |
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2024
Assert that params with the same *index* have the same *name* Found this bug when trying to build libcore with the new solver, since it will canonicalize two params with the same index into *different* placeholders if those params differ by name.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Found this bug when trying to build libcore with the new solver, since it will canonicalize two params with the same index into different placeholders if those params differ by name.