Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

const_mut_refs: allow mutable pointers to statics #120932

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2024

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Fixes #118447

Writing this PR became a bit messy, see Zulip for some of my journey.^^ Turns out there was a long-standing bug in our qualif logic that led to us incorrectly classifying certain places as "no interior mut" when they actually had interior mut. Due to that the const_refs_to_cell feature gate was required far less often than it otherwise would, e.g. in this code. Fixing this however would be a massive breaking change all over libcore and likely the wider ecosystem. So I also changed the const-checking logic to just not require the feature gate for the affected cases. While doing so I discovered a bunch of logic that is not explained and that I could not explain. However I think stabilizing some const-eval feature will make most of that logic inconsequential so I just added some FIXMEs and left it at that.

r? @oli-obk

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 11, 2024
// `StorageDead` in every control flow path leading to a `return` terminator.
// The good news is that interning will detect if any unexpected mutable
// pointer slips through.
if place.is_indirect_first_projection() || self.local_has_storage_dead(place.local)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume this runs after the deref'er? Debug assertions would fire if the Deref was later in the projection chain.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I get a bunch of debug assertion failures.^^

Hm, but... the "reborrow" checks only check the first projection. How does that make sense then?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

derefer is still after borrowck. We haven't managed to move it earlier yet

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This means &mut (*ptr).field will not hit the reborrow code path in const-checking. I wonder if there's an example here where this PR changes behavior because of that...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah no, not hitting that codepath is largely inconsequential for shared references since the qualif will say "there is no interior mutability" for any path that involves a Deref, and thus just allow it.

So there's just the mutable reborrow path that could act strangely. I'm surprised we allow mutable reborrows at all given that we don't usually want to allow anything with mutable borrows.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, I think for mutable references that reborrow logic largely serves to avoid duplicate errors, and to paper over particular desugarings (like how _ as *mut _ becomes a reborrow).

I can't wait to rip out all this half-effective logic when we stabilize const_mut_refs.^^

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

@RalfJung RalfJung Feb 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW this file does not trigger error code 0017. Nor does the other file trigger error code 0388.

Cc #120935

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@RalfJung RalfJung changed the title const_mut_refs: allow mutable refs to statics const_mut_refs: allow mutable pointers to statics Feb 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

before I try to understand the full logic, here are some things I def don't understand

tests/ui/error-codes/E0017.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/ui/error-codes/E0388.stderr Show resolved Hide resolved
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 12, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
check_consts: fix duplicate errors, make importance consistent

This is stuff I noticed while working on rust-lang#120932, but it's orthogonal to that PR.

r? `@oli-obk`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
check_consts: fix duplicate errors, make importance consistent

This is stuff I noticed while working on rust-lang#120932, but it's orthogonal to that PR.

r? ``@oli-obk``
@oli-obk oli-obk added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 12, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120933 - RalfJung:const-check-misc, r=oli-obk

check_consts: fix duplicate errors, make importance consistent

This is stuff I noticed while working on rust-lang#120932, but it's orthogonal to that PR.

r? ``@oli-obk``
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 17, 2024

📌 Commit 340f8aa has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 17, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2024
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119032 (Use a hardcoded constant instead of calling OpenProcessToken.)
 - rust-lang#120932 (const_mut_refs: allow mutable pointers to statics)
 - rust-lang#121059 (Add and use a simple extension trait derive macro in the compiler)
 - rust-lang#121135 (coverage: Discard spans that fill the entire function body)
 - rust-lang#121187 (Add examples to document the return type of quickselect functions)
 - rust-lang#121191 (Add myself to review rotation (and a rustbot ping))
 - rust-lang#121192 (Give some intrinsics fallback bodies)
 - rust-lang#121197 (Ensure `./configure` works when `configure.py` path contains spaces)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f70f13a into rust-lang:master Feb 17, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 17, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120932 - RalfJung:mut-ptr-to-static, r=oli-obk

const_mut_refs: allow mutable pointers to statics

Fixes rust-lang#118447

Writing this PR became a bit messy, see [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/146212-t-compiler.2Fconst-eval/topic/Statics.20pointing.20to.20interior.20mutable.20statics) for some of my journey.^^ Turns out there was a long-standing bug in our qualif logic that led to us incorrectly classifying certain places as "no interior mut" when they actually had interior mut. Due to that the `const_refs_to_cell` feature gate was required far less often than it otherwise would, e.g. in [this code](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=9e0c042c451b3d11d64dd6263679a164). Fixing this however would be a massive breaking change all over libcore and likely the wider ecosystem. So I also changed the const-checking logic to just not require the feature gate for the affected cases. While doing so I discovered a bunch of logic that is not explained and that I could not explain. However I think stabilizing some const-eval feature will make most of that logic inconsequential so I just added some FIXMEs and left it at that.

r? `@oli-obk`
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the mut-ptr-to-static branch February 18, 2024 08:34
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

This turned out to be a breaking change: #121250.

Let's see if we can crater this after the fact...

@craterbot run start=dfdbe30004a095ad63951c4cd6e10a9a971a7399 end=ba824a2e25948a86596ccf7594afe548020e86e6 mode=check-only

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

👌 Experiment pr-120932 created and queued.
🔍 You can check out the queue and this experiment's details.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot craterbot added S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 19, 2024
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

Since this crater run is on the critical path for what to do with #121250...
@craterbot p=1

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

📝 Configuration of the pr-120932 experiment changed.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@craterbot start=master#dfdbe30004a095ad63951c4cd6e10a9a971a7399 end=master#ba824a2e25948a86596ccf7594afe548020e86e6

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

📝 Configuration of the pr-120932 experiment changed.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚧 Experiment pr-120932 is now running

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 Experiment pr-120932 is completed!
📊 3 regressed and 0 fixed (418672 total)
📰 Open the full report.

⚠️ If you notice any spurious failure please add them to the blacklist!
ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot craterbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. labels Feb 22, 2024
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

(Will post findings in #121250)

ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2024
This is the next upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.77.1 to 1.78.0
(i.e. the latest) [1].

See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in
commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2").

# Unstable features

There have been no changes to the set of unstable features used in
our own code. Therefore, the only unstable features allowed to be used
outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`.

However, since we are finally dropping our `alloc` fork [3], all the
unstable features used by `alloc` (~30 language ones, ~60 library ones)
are not a concern anymore. This reduces the maintanance burden, increases
the chances of new compiler versions working without changes and gets
us closer to the goal of supporting several compiler versions.

It also means that, ignoring non-language/library features, we are
currently left with just the few language features needed to implement the
kernel `Arc`, the `new_uninit` library feature, the `compiler_builtins`
marker and the few `no_*` `cfg`s we pass when compiling `core`/`alloc`.

Please see [4] for details.

# Required changes

## LLVM's data layout

Rust 1.77.0 (i.e. the previous upgrade) introduced a check for matching
LLVM data layouts [5]. Then, Rust 1.78.0 upgraded LLVM's bundled major
version from 17 to 18 [6], which changed the data layout in x86 [7]. Thus
update the data layout in our custom target specification for x86 so
that the compiler does not complain about the mismatch:

    error: data-layout for target `target-5559158138856098584`,
    `e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128`,
    differs from LLVM target's `x86_64-linux-gnu` default layout,
    `e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128`

In the future, the goal is to drop the custom target specification
files. Meanwhile, if we want to support other LLVM versions used
in `rustc` (e.g. for LTO), we will need to add some extra logic
(e.g. conditional on LLVM's version, or extracting the data layout from
an existing built-in target specification).

## `unused_imports`

Rust's `unused_imports` lint covers both unused and redudant imports.
Now, in 1.78.0, the lint detects more cases of redundant imports [8].
Thus the previous commit cleaned them up.

## Clippy's `new_without_default`

Clippy now suggests to implement `Default` even when `new()` is `const`,
since `Default::default()` may call `const` functions even if it is not
`const` itself [9]. Thus the previous commit added the implementation.

# Other changes in Rust

Rust 1.78.0 introduces `feature(asm_goto)` [10] [11]. This feature was
discussed in the past [12].

Rust 1.78.0 introduced support for mutable pointers to Rust statics,
including a test case for the Linux kernel's `VTABLE` use case [13].

Rust 1.78.0 with debug assertions enabled (i.e. `-Cdebug-assertions=y`,
kernel's `CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS=y`) will now always check all
unsafe preconditions, without a way to opt-out for particular cases [14].

Rust 1.78.0 also improved a couple issues we reported when giving feedback
for the new `--check-cfg` feature [15] [16].

# `alloc` upgrade and reviewing

As mentioned above, compiler upgrades will not update `alloc` anymore,
since we are dropping our `alloc` fork [3].

As a bonus, even if that series is not applied, the new compiler release
happens to build cleanly the existing `alloc` too (i.e. the previous
version's).

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1770-2024-03-21 [1]
Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ [3]
Link: Rust-for-Linux#2 [4]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120062 [5]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120055 [6]
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 [7]
Link: rust-lang/rust#117772 [8]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#10903 [9]
Link: rust-lang/rust#119365 [10]
Link: rust-lang/rust#119364 [11]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ [12]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120932 [13]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120969 [14]
Link: rust-lang/rust#121202 [15]
Link: rust-lang/rust#121237 [16]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2024
This is the next upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.77.1 to 1.78.0
(i.e. the latest) [1].

See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in
commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2").

# Unstable features

There have been no changes to the set of unstable features used in
our own code. Therefore, the only unstable features allowed to be used
outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`.

However, since we are finally dropping our `alloc` fork [3], all the
unstable features used by `alloc` (~30 language ones, ~60 library ones)
are not a concern anymore. This reduces the maintenance burden, increases
the chances of new compiler versions working without changes and gets
us closer to the goal of supporting several compiler versions.

It also means that, ignoring non-language/library features, we are
currently left with just the few language features needed to implement the
kernel `Arc`, the `new_uninit` library feature, the `compiler_builtins`
marker and the few `no_*` `cfg`s we pass when compiling `core`/`alloc`.

Please see [4] for details.

# Required changes

## LLVM's data layout

Rust 1.77.0 (i.e. the previous upgrade) introduced a check for matching
LLVM data layouts [5]. Then, Rust 1.78.0 upgraded LLVM's bundled major
version from 17 to 18 [6], which changed the data layout in x86 [7]. Thus
update the data layout in our custom target specification for x86 so
that the compiler does not complain about the mismatch:

    error: data-layout for target `target-5559158138856098584`,
    `e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128`,
    differs from LLVM target's `x86_64-linux-gnu` default layout,
    `e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128`

In the future, the goal is to drop the custom target specification
files. Meanwhile, if we want to support other LLVM versions used
in `rustc` (e.g. for LTO), we will need to add some extra logic
(e.g. conditional on LLVM's version, or extracting the data layout from
an existing built-in target specification).

## `unused_imports`

Rust's `unused_imports` lint covers both unused and redundant imports.
Now, in 1.78.0, the lint detects more cases of redundant imports [8].
Thus one of the previous patches cleaned them up.

## Clippy's `new_without_default`

Clippy now suggests to implement `Default` even when `new()` is `const`,
since `Default::default()` may call `const` functions even if it is not
`const` itself [9]. Thus one of the previous patches implemented it.

# Other changes in Rust

Rust 1.78.0 introduced `feature(asm_goto)` [10] [11]. This feature was
discussed in the past [12].

Rust 1.78.0 introduced support for mutable pointers to Rust statics,
including a test case for the Linux kernel's `VTABLE` use case [13].

Rust 1.78.0 with debug assertions enabled (i.e. `-Cdebug-assertions=y`,
kernel's `CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS=y`) now always checks all unsafe
preconditions, without a way to opt-out for particular cases [14].

Rust 1.78.0 also improved a couple issues we reported when giving feedback
for the new `--check-cfg` feature [15] [16].

# `alloc` upgrade and reviewing

As mentioned above, compiler upgrades will not update `alloc` anymore,
since we are dropping our `alloc` fork [3].

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1780-2024-05-02 [1]
Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ [3]
Link: Rust-for-Linux#2 [4]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120062 [5]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120055 [6]
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 [7]
Link: rust-lang/rust#117772 [8]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#10903 [9]
Link: rust-lang/rust#119365 [10]
Link: rust-lang/rust#119364 [11]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ [12]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120932 [13]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120969 [14]
Link: rust-lang/rust#121202 [15]
Link: rust-lang/rust#121237 [16]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2024
This is the next upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.77.1 to 1.78.0
(i.e. the latest) [1].

See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in
commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2").

# Unstable features

There have been no changes to the set of unstable features used in
our own code. Therefore, the only unstable features allowed to be used
outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`.

However, since we are finally dropping our `alloc` fork [3], all the
unstable features used by `alloc` (~30 language ones, ~60 library ones)
are not a concern anymore. This reduces the maintenance burden, increases
the chances of new compiler versions working without changes and gets
us closer to the goal of supporting several compiler versions.

It also means that, ignoring non-language/library features, we are
currently left with just the few language features needed to implement the
kernel `Arc`, the `new_uninit` library feature, the `compiler_builtins`
marker and the few `no_*` `cfg`s we pass when compiling `core`/`alloc`.

Please see [4] for details.

# Required changes

## LLVM's data layout

Rust 1.77.0 (i.e. the previous upgrade) introduced a check for matching
LLVM data layouts [5]. Then, Rust 1.78.0 upgraded LLVM's bundled major
version from 17 to 18 [6], which changed the data layout in x86 [7]. Thus
update the data layout in our custom target specification for x86 so
that the compiler does not complain about the mismatch:

    error: data-layout for target `target-5559158138856098584`,
    `e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128`,
    differs from LLVM target's `x86_64-linux-gnu` default layout,
    `e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128`

In the future, the goal is to drop the custom target specifications.
Meanwhile, if we want to support other LLVM versions used in `rustc`
(e.g. for LTO), we will need to add some extra logic (e.g. conditional on
LLVM's version, or extracting the data layout from an existing built-in
target specification).

## `unused_imports`

Rust's `unused_imports` lint covers both unused and redundant imports.
Now, in 1.78.0, the lint detects more cases of redundant imports [8].
Thus one of the previous patches cleaned them up.

## Clippy's `new_without_default`

Clippy now suggests to implement `Default` even when `new()` is `const`,
since `Default::default()` may call `const` functions even if it is not
`const` itself [9]. Thus one of the previous patches implemented it.

# Other changes in Rust

Rust 1.78.0 introduced `feature(asm_goto)` [10] [11]. This feature was
discussed in the past [12].

Rust 1.78.0 introduced support for mutable pointers to Rust statics,
including a test case for the Linux kernel's `VTABLE` use case [13].

Rust 1.78.0 with debug assertions enabled (i.e. `-Cdebug-assertions=y`,
kernel's `CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS=y`) now always checks all unsafe
preconditions, without a way to opt-out for particular cases [14].

Rust 1.78.0 also improved a couple issues we reported when giving feedback
for the new `--check-cfg` feature [15] [16].

# `alloc` upgrade and reviewing

As mentioned above, compiler upgrades will not update `alloc` anymore,
since we are dropping our `alloc` fork [3].

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1780-2024-05-02 [1]
Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ [3]
Link: Rust-for-Linux#2 [4]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120062 [5]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120055 [6]
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 [7]
Link: rust-lang/rust#117772 [8]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#10903 [9]
Link: rust-lang/rust#119365 [10]
Link: rust-lang/rust#119364 [11]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ [12]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120932 [13]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120969 [14]
Link: rust-lang/rust#121202 [15]
Link: rust-lang/rust#121237 [16]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2024
check_consts: fix duplicate errors, make importance consistent

This is stuff I noticed while working on rust-lang/rust#120932, but it's orthogonal to that PR.

r? ``@oli-obk``
RalfJung pushed a commit to RalfJung/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2024
check_consts: fix duplicate errors, make importance consistent

This is stuff I noticed while working on rust-lang/rust#120932, but it's orthogonal to that PR.

r? ``@oli-obk``
ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this pull request May 5, 2024
This is the next upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.77.1 to 1.78.0
(i.e. the latest) [1].

See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in
commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2").

It is much smaller than previous upgrades, since the `alloc` fork was
dropped in commit 9d0441b ("rust: alloc: remove our fork of the
`alloc` crate") [3].

# Unstable features

There have been no changes to the set of unstable features used in
our own code. Therefore, the only unstable features allowed to be used
outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`.

However, since we finally dropped our `alloc` fork [3], all the unstable
features used by `alloc` (~30 language ones, ~60 library ones) are not
a concern anymore. This reduces the maintenance burden, increases the
chances of new compiler versions working without changes and gets us
closer to the goal of supporting several compiler versions.

It also means that, ignoring non-language/library features, we are
currently left with just the few language features needed to implement the
kernel `Arc`, the `new_uninit` library feature, the `compiler_builtins`
marker and the few `no_*` `cfg`s we pass when compiling `core`/`alloc`.

Please see [4] for details.

# Required changes

## LLVM's data layout

Rust 1.77.0 (i.e. the previous upgrade) introduced a check for matching
LLVM data layouts [5]. Then, Rust 1.78.0 upgraded LLVM's bundled major
version from 17 to 18 [6], which changed the data layout in x86 [7]. Thus
update the data layout in our custom target specification for x86 so
that the compiler does not complain about the mismatch:

    error: data-layout for target `target-5559158138856098584`,
    `e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128`,
    differs from LLVM target's `x86_64-linux-gnu` default layout,
    `e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128`

In the future, the goal is to drop the custom target specifications.
Meanwhile, if we want to support other LLVM versions used in `rustc`
(e.g. for LTO), we will need to add some extra logic (e.g. conditional on
LLVM's version, or extracting the data layout from an existing built-in
target specification).

## `unused_imports`

Rust's `unused_imports` lint covers both unused and redundant imports.
Now, in 1.78.0, the lint detects more cases of redundant imports [8].
Thus one of the previous patches cleaned them up.

## Clippy's `new_without_default`

Clippy now suggests to implement `Default` even when `new()` is `const`,
since `Default::default()` may call `const` functions even if it is not
`const` itself [9]. Thus one of the previous patches implemented it.

# Other changes in Rust

Rust 1.78.0 introduced `feature(asm_goto)` [10] [11]. This feature was
discussed in the past [12].

Rust 1.78.0 introduced `feature(const_refs_to_static)` [13] to allow
referencing statics in constants and extended `feature(const_mut_refs)`
to allow raw mutable pointers in constants. Together, this should cover
the kernel's `VTABLE` use case. In fact, the implementation [14] in
upstream Rust added a test case for it [15].

Rust 1.78.0 with debug assertions enabled (i.e. `-Cdebug-assertions=y`,
kernel's `CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS=y`) now always checks all unsafe
preconditions, though without a way to opt-out for particular cases [16].
It would be ideal to have a way to selectively disable certain checks
per-call site for this one (i.e. not just per check but for particular
instances of a check), even if the vast majority of the checks remain
in place [17].

Rust 1.78.0 also improved a couple issues we reported when giving feedback
for the new `--check-cfg` feature [18] [19].

# `alloc` upgrade and reviewing

As mentioned above, compiler upgrades will not update `alloc` anymore,
since we dropped our `alloc` fork [3].

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1780-2024-05-02 [1]
Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ [3]
Link: Rust-for-Linux#2 [4]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120062 [5]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120055 [6]
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 [7]
Link: rust-lang/rust#117772 [8]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#10903 [9]
Link: rust-lang/rust#119365 [10]
Link: rust-lang/rust#119364 [11]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ [12]
Link: rust-lang/rust#119618 [13]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120932 [14]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120932/files#diff-e6fc1622c46054cd46b1d225c5386c5554564b3b0fa8a03c2dc2d8627a1079d9 [15]
Link: rust-lang/rust#120969 [16]
Link: Rust-for-Linux#354 [17]
Link: rust-lang/rust#121202 [18]
Link: rust-lang/rust#121237 [19]
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ Added a few more details and links I mentioned in the list. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

const checker confuses "pointer to static mut" with "local mutable variable that escapes this scope"
8 participants