Remove useless lifetime of ArchiveBuilder

[823984418]

trait ArchiveBuilder<'a> has a seemingly useless lifetime a, so I remove it. If this is intentional, please reject this PR.

pub trait ArchiveBuilder<'a> {
    fn add_file(&mut self, path: &Path);

    fn add_archive(
        &mut self,
        archive: &Path,
        skip: Box<dyn FnMut(&str) -> bool + 'static>,
    ) -> io::Result<()>;

    fn build(self: Box<Self>, output: &Path) -> bool;
}

[rustbot]

r? @nnethercote

rustbot has assigned @nnethercote.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo, @GuillaumeGomez

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift

cc @bjorn3

[nnethercote]

Nice find. I'm surprised the compiler doesn't complain about the useless lifetime.

@bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 0c082b7 has been approved by nnethercote

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 0c082b7 with merge 91cae1d...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nnethercote
Pushing 91cae1d to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (91cae1d): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.0%	[1.0%, 1.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.6%	[2.1%, 3.1%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 649.3s -> 651.218s (0.30%)
Artifact size: 311.08 MiB -> 311.14 MiB (0.02%)