Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove tracing tree indent lines #125378

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 30, 2024
Merged

remove tracing tree indent lines #125378

merged 5 commits into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented May 21, 2024

This allows vscode to collapse nested spans without having to manually remove the indent lines. This is incredibly useful when logging the new solver. I don't mind making them optional depending on some environment flag if you prefer using indent lines

For a gist of the new output, see https://gist.github.com/lcnr/bb4360ddbc5cd4631f2fbc569057e5eb#file-example-output-L181

r? @oli-obk

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels May 21, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 21, 2024

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor

Some changes occurred in exhaustiveness checking

cc @Nadrieril

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented May 22, 2024

yea, I'm fixing this on the tracing-tree side, too, but let's go with just disabling them for now

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 22, 2024

📌 Commit 1005cc7 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 22, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
remove tracing tree indent lines

This allows vscode to collapse nested spans without having to manually remove the indent lines. This is incredibly useful when logging the new solver. I don't mind making them optional depending on some environment flag if you prefer using indent lines

For a gist of the new output, see https://gist.github.com/lcnr/bb4360ddbc5cd4631f2fbc569057e5eb#file-example-output-L181

r? `@oli-obk`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124227 (Make sure that the method resolution matches in `note_source_of_type_mismatch_constraint`)
 - rust-lang#124896 (miri: rename intrinsic_fallback_checks_ub to intrinsic_fallback_is_spec)
 - rust-lang#125015 (Pattern types: Prohibit generic args on const params)
 - rust-lang#125043 (reference type safety invariant docs: clarification)
 - rust-lang#125259 (An async closure may implement `FnMut`/`Fn` if it has no self-borrows)
 - rust-lang#125306 (Force the inner coroutine of an async closure to `move` if the outer closure is `move` and `FnOnce`)
 - rust-lang#125378 (remove tracing tree indent lines)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
remove tracing tree indent lines

This allows vscode to collapse nested spans without having to manually remove the indent lines. This is incredibly useful when logging the new solver. I don't mind making them optional depending on some environment flag if you prefer using indent lines

For a gist of the new output, see https://gist.github.com/lcnr/bb4360ddbc5cd4631f2fbc569057e5eb#file-example-output-L181

r? ``@oli-obk``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125043 (reference type safety invariant docs: clarification)
 - rust-lang#125306 (Force the inner coroutine of an async closure to `move` if the outer closure is `move` and `FnOnce`)
 - rust-lang#125355 (Use Backtrace::force_capture instead of Backtrace::capture in rustc_log)
 - rust-lang#125378 (remove tracing tree indent lines)
 - rust-lang#125391 (Minor serialize/span tweaks)
 - rust-lang#125395 (Remove unnecessary `.md` from the documentation sidebar)
 - rust-lang#125399 (Stop using `to_hir_binop` in codegen)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented May 22, 2024

Hey, hey :)

Unfortunately, we've got some rmake test failures: #125393 (comment) (and its dupe: #125414 (comment)).
This is due to the fact that the tests/run-make/rust-lld{,-by-default,-custom-target}/rmake.rs test runners parse the info-level tracing output to obtain the version of the LLD linker. The regexes inside the 3 find_lld_version_in_logs fns need to be updated to account for the indent I presume.

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 22, 2024
@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the tracing-no-lines branch from 1005cc7 to f18cb8a Compare May 24, 2024 15:46
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 24, 2024

Some changes occurred in run-make tests.

cc @jieyouxu

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented May 24, 2024

I couldn't test these changes locally on the dev desktop, but I think that this should fix it

@bors rollup=never

@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the tracing-no-lines branch from db9bf14 to f0c38d5 Compare May 24, 2024 15:59
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 24, 2024

📌 Commit f0c38d5 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 24, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 24, 2024
…rors

remove tracing tree indent lines

This allows vscode to collapse nested spans without having to manually remove the indent lines. This is incredibly useful when logging the new solver. I don't mind making them optional depending on some environment flag if you prefer using indent lines

For a gist of the new output, see https://gist.github.com/lcnr/bb4360ddbc5cd4631f2fbc569057e5eb#file-example-output-L181

r? `@oli-obk`
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 24, 2024
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented May 24, 2024

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 24, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2024

⌛ Testing commit f0c38d5 with merge 9372cd2...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 25, 2024
…rors

remove tracing tree indent lines

This allows vscode to collapse nested spans without having to manually remove the indent lines. This is incredibly useful when logging the new solver. I don't mind making them optional depending on some environment flag if you prefer using indent lines

For a gist of the new output, see https://gist.github.com/lcnr/bb4360ddbc5cd4631f2fbc569057e5eb#file-example-output-L181

r? `@oli-obk`
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 25, 2024
let lld_version_re = Regex::new(r"^LLD [0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+").unwrap();
let stderr = std::str::from_utf8(&output.stderr).unwrap();
stderr.lines().any(|line| lld_version_re.is_match(line))
stderr.lines().any(|line| lld_version_re.is_match(line.trim_whitespace()))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
stderr.lines().any(|line| lld_version_re.is_match(line.trim_whitespace()))
stderr.lines().any(|line| lld_version_re.is_match(line.trim()))

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah 😅

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

@bors r- (manually r- because the tree looks wonky with some PRs that shouldn't be elligble for rollup)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 26, 2024
@lcnr lcnr force-pushed the tracing-no-lines branch from f0c38d5 to 8160974 Compare May 30, 2024 13:28
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented May 30, 2024

@bors r=oli-obk rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 30, 2024

📌 Commit 8160974 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 30, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 30, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 8160974 with merge 6f3df08...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 30, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing 6f3df08 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 30, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 6f3df08 into rust-lang:master May 30, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 30, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (6f3df08): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -4.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-4.3% [-4.3%, -4.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -4.3% [-4.3%, -4.3%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary -2.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 670.972s -> 670.547s (-0.06%)
Artifact size: 318.73 MiB -> 318.70 MiB (-0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants