Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

trans her gender #128293

Merged
Merged

Conversation

aDotInTheVoid
Copy link
Member

@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 27, 2024
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup p=1 (this is the most important pr ever)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 27, 2024

📌 Commit 16fc1bb has been approved by Noratrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 27, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 16fc1bb with merge 7c20b30...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job i686-mingw failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
---- [run-make] tests\run-make\dump-ice-to-disk stdout ----

error: rmake recipe failed to complete
status: exit code: 101
command: "C:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\i686-pc-windows-gnu\\test\\run-make\\dump-ice-to-disk\\rmake.exe"
--- stderr -------------------------------
thread 'main' panicked at C:\a\rust\rust\tests\run-make\dump-ice-to-disk\rmake.rs:55:5:
assertion `left == right` failed
  left: 61

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 28, 2024
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jul 28, 2024

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 28, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 16fc1bb with merge 0bb6fec...

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Jul 28, 2024

Huh that's concerning... how did that test fail 😅
Cannot reproduce failure locally on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu or x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

wtf

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Noratrieb
Pushing 0bb6fec to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 28, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 0bb6fec into rust-lang:master Jul 28, 2024
13 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Jul 28, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0bb6fec): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [1.5%, 4.5%] 11
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 769.808s -> 772.73s (0.38%)
Artifact size: 331.62 MiB -> 331.60 MiB (-0.01%)

@aDotInTheVoid aDotInTheVoid deleted the github-pls-fix-🏳️‍⚧️ branch August 13, 2024 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants